Differential and combined effects of cardiotrophin-1 and TGF-β1on cardiac myofibroblast proliferation and contraction

Abstract

Myofibroblasts respond to an array of signals from mitogens and cytokines during the course of wound healing following a myocardial infarction (MI), and these signals may coordinate ventricular myofibroblast proliferation. Furthermore, myofibroblasts are contractile and contribute to wound contraction by imparting mechanical tension on surrounding extracellular matrix. Although TGF-beta(1), CT-1, and PDGF-BB participate in various stages of post-MI wound healing, their combined net effect(s) on myofibroblast function is unknown. We investigated myofibroblast proliferation, expression of cell cycle proteins, and contractile function of cells treated with TGF-beta(1) and/or CT-1. We confirmed that TGF-beta(1) (10 ng/ml) suppresses proliferation of these cells, whereas CT-1 (10 ng/ml) and, for comparative purposes, PDGF-BB (1 ng/ml) treatments were associated with proliferation. Specific TGF-beta(1) treatment ablated CT-1-induced myofibroblast proliferation. TGF-beta(1) effects were specific, as they were suppressed by either TGF-beta-neutralizing antibody or viral Smad7 overexpression. TGF-beta(1) treatment also increased expression of p27 and decreased expression of cyclin E and Cdk2 in primary cells. CT-1 (10 ng/ml) treatment of myofibroblasts had no effect on collagen gel deformation versus controls, whereas TGF-beta(1) (10 ng/ml) and PDGF (10 ng/ml) treatments were associated with significant cell contraction; again, TGF-beta(1)-mediated contraction was unaffected by CT-1. Alone, CT-1 and TGF-beta(1) treatments exert opposing effects on myofibroblast function, whereas in combination TGF-beta(1)-mediated effects supersede those of CT-1 (and PDGF-BB). Thus TGF-beta(1) and CT-1 exert differential effects on myofibroblast proliferation and contraction in vitro, and we suggest that a balance of these effects may be important for the execution of normal cardiac wound healing.