Abstract

Schisandrin A (Sch A) and schisandrin B (Sch B) are active components of Schisandrae Fructus. We compared the biochemical mechanism underlying the anti-inflammatory action of Sch A and Sch B, using cultured lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages and concanavalin (ConA)-stimulated mouse splenocytes. Pre-incubation with Sch A or Sch B produced an anti-inflammatory action in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells, as evidenced by the inhibition of the pro-inflammatory c-Jun N-terminal kinases/p38 kinase/nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway as well as the suppression of various pro-inflammatory cytokines and effectors, with the extent of inhibition by Sch A being more pronounced. The greater activity of Sch A in anti-inflammatory response was associated with a greater decrease in cellular reduced glutathione (GSH) level and a greater increase in glutathione S-transferase activity than corresponding changes produced by Sch B. However, upon incubation, only Sch B resulted in the activation of the nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like factor 2 and the induction of a significant increase in the expression of thioredoxin (TRX) in RAW264.7 cells. The Sch B-induced increase in TRX expression was associated with the suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and effectors in LPS-stimulated macrophages. Studies in a mouse model of inflammation (carrageenan-induced paw edema) indicated that while long-term treatment with either Sch A or Sch B suppressed the extent of paw edema, only acute treatment with Sch A produced a significant degree of inhibition on the inflammatory response. Although only Sch A decreased the cellular GSH level and suppressed the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and cell proliferation in ConA-simulated splenocytes in vitro, both Sch A and Sch B treatments, while not altering cellular GSH levels, suppressed ConA-stimulated splenocyte proliferation ex vivo. These results suggest that Sch A and Sch B may act differentially on activating GST/ depleting cellular GSH and inducing an antioxidant response involved in their anti-inflammatory actions.

Highlights

  • The inflammatory response, as an integral part of innate immunity, enables the removal of pathogens and the clearance of injured cells by means of a complex interplay involving resident immune cells and patrolling immune cells via a series of biochemical events [1]

  • We examined the effects of Schisandrin A (Sch A) and schisandrin B (Sch B) on the proinflammatory signal transduction pathway (JNK1/2, p38 and NK-κB), on pro-inflammatory cytokines [tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin 1β (IL-1β) and on interleukin 6 (IL6)] and inflammatory effectors [inducible nitric oxide synthase, nitric oxide, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)] in LPS-activated RAW264.7 macrophages (Fig 2)

  • The anti-inflammatory action produced by Sch A and Sch B was associated with their ability to increase glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity and decrease cellular GSH level in macrophages, with the degree of stimulation/depletion produced by Sch A being more pronounced

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The inflammatory response, as an integral part of innate immunity, enables the removal of pathogens and the clearance of injured cells by means of a complex interplay involving resident immune cells (resident macrophages) and patrolling immune cells (monocytes/macrophages, natural killer cells and neutrophils, etc) via a series of biochemical events [1]. Recent experimental evidence has suggested that the increased production of reactive oxygen species in T lymphocytes can alter cellular signaling transduction pathways, such as the modulation of T cell receptor signaling, the activation of the Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase-1 (SHP-1) and the inactivation of tyrosine-specific protein phosphatase (PTPase) activities, with the resultant immunosenescence and other adverse effects [11]. In this regard, the activation of an antioxidant response, which counteracts oxidative stress, is likely to produce a beneficial effect against inflammation. The search for antiinflammatory agents, those with the ability to induce a Nrfs-mediated antioxidant response, is urgently in need

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.