Abstract
This paper argues that the false acquittals of serial offenders are much costlier than the false acquittals of first-time offenders. Because that is so, it is plausible to entertain the idea that different standards of proof should be used in trying criminal cases of the two sets of defendants. First-time offenders should continue to be tried using proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Known serial felony offenders should be tried by the clear and convincing evidence standard.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
