Abstract
Background Postoperative urinary retention is a disease that seriously affects human daily work and life, and greatly reduces people's quality of life and affects human health all over the world. Now, many studies have shown that moxibustion has a significant effect on postoperative urinary retention. In this study, network meta-analysis was used to analyze and compare the clinical efficacy and difference of different moxibustion treatments on postoperative urinary retention. Methods Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be included and all patients were diagnosed as postoperative urinary retention. Computer search Chinese databases: CNKI, Wanfang (WANFANG), VIP (VIP), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed), English database search PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science. The search period limit is from the time the date of database establishment to November 17, 2020. To avoid omissions, we will manually search for relevant reference materials and conference papers. The risk of bias in the final included studies will be assessed according to the guidelines of the Cochrane System Intervention Review Manual. All data analysis will be conducted by Revman5.3, Gemtc 0.14.3, and Stata 14.2. Results The effectiveness of each intervention was quantified. The main results included effective rate, first urination time, and residual urine volume. Conclusion Objective to provide evidence-based medicine basis for clinicians to choose more effective moxibustion therapy for postoperative urinary retention.
Highlights
Review question / Objective: Participants: The patients diagnosed as Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) meet the internationally recognized diagnostic criteria and have clear curative effect criteria
Interventions:The experimental group was treated with thermal moxibustion,ginger moxibustion,gentle moxibustion
INPLASY registration number: This protocol was registered with the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY) on 27 November 2020 and was last updated on 27 November 2020
Summary
To cite: Hu et al Different moxibustion therapies for urinary retention after anorectal surgery:A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. Different moxibustion therapies for urinary retention after anorectal surgery: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. Comparison: The control group was treated with conventional nursing or intramuscular injection of neostigmine Both the experimental group and the control group could cooperate with conventional medical treatment. Outcome: The included outcome indicators included one or more of the following: 1 Effective rate: refer to "Surgery Complications" and "People's Republic of China Traditional Chinese Medicine Industry Standards·Standards for Diagnostic Efficacy of TCM Diseases", including 4 levels of recovery, markedly effective, effective and ineffective, effective rate = [(Healed + markedly effective + effective) / total number of cases] × 100%; 2 First urination time.. INPLASY registration number: This protocol was registered with the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY) on 27 November 2020 and was last updated on 27 November 2020 (registration number INPLASY2020110124)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
