Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate different microalgae species as protein supplements in the nutrition of lactating dairy cows in comparison to soya bean meal. Four multiparous lactating Finnish Ayrshire cows (112 days in milk) were used in a balanced 4 × 4 Latin square study. Cows were fed separately fixed amount of cereal-sugar beet pulp based concentrate (12.5 kg/d) and grass silage ad libitum. Experimental treatments consisted of four isonitrogenous protein supplements: soya bean meal (SOY), Spirulina platensis (SPI), Chlorella vulgaris (CHL) and a mixture of C. vulgaris and Nannochloropsis gaditana (1:1 on dry matter (DM) basis; CHL-NAN). The substitution of soya bean meal by microalgae did not affect the quantity of total DM intake (DMI), but changed the composition of DMI by decreasing the concentrate:forage ratio of the diet (P = 0.054) owing to the poorer palatability of microalgae. Intake of methionine was increased (P < 0.01) and that of histidine decreased (P < 0.01) with microalgae diets compared to SOY, but no significant changes in arterial concentrations were observed. The digestibility of nutrients, milk or energy corrected milk (ECM) yield were not affected by dietary treatments. Though, owing to SPI, algae diets resulted in numerically +2.2 kg/d higher ECM yield than SOY. Microalgae diets tended to result in higher milk fat (P = 0.073), arterial acetic acid (P = 0.055) and non-esterified fatty acid (P = 0.060) concentrations than SOY. Milk fat (P < 0.05) and arterial acetic acid (P = 0.010) concentrations were increased and milk fat yield tended to increase (P = 0.098) on SPI compared to CHL and CHL-NAN. Urinary nitrogen excretion was also lower (P < 0.05) for microalgae diets than for SOY. Microalgae diets resulted in higher secretion of Δ16:2 (P < 0.05), cis-9, cis-12, cis-15 18:3 (α-linoleic acid; ALA) (P < 0.05), cis-6, cis-9, cis-12 18:3 (P < 0.05) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) (P < 0.05) in milk than SOY. Secretion of cis-5, cis-8, cis-11, cis-14, cis-17 20:5 (eicosapentaenoic acid; EPA) in milk tended to be higher on CHL and CHL-NAN than on SPI (P = 0.060), and was higher on CHL-NAN than on CHL (P < 0.05). Also the omega-6:omega-3 ratio was lower (P < 0.05) for CHL-NAN than for CHL. The results suggest that microalgae are likely comparable protein feed to soya bean meal in dairy cow nutrition, especially if palatability of microalgae can be improved.

Highlights

  • European Union (EU) is highly dependent on protein feed imports and especially the self-sufficiency of soya beans (Glycine max) is very low being only 5% (Bouxin, 2017)

  • Of protein feeds, the concentration of crude fat was lowest in soya bean supplement and the fatty acids (FA) profiles of protein feeds clearly differed from each other

  • Despite of poorer palatability of microalgae concentrates, microalgae diets resulted in milk and energy corrected milk (ECM) yields similar to soya bean meal, with spirulina having numerically the highest yields

Read more

Summary

Introduction

European Union (EU) is highly dependent on protein feed imports and especially the self-sufficiency of soya beans (Glycine max) is very low being only 5% (Bouxin, 2017) This makes livestock sector vulnerable to trade distortions, availability and price volatility of soya beans (Häusling, 2011; de Visser et al, 2014). The reduction of the protein deficit of EU is considered to have multiple ecological and socio-economic advantages (Häusling, 2011) This requires both the improvement of current protein feed production systems such as increased utilisation of pulses as well as the development of novel protein feed resources such as microalgae, that include both prokaryotic species such as cyanobacteria, and eukaryotic species such as chlorophytes belonging to green algae. Microalgae may perform more favourably in comparison to soya bean meal as rapeseed meal generally results in greater milk production response than soya bean meal on grass silage based diets (Huhtanen et al, 2011; Martineau et al, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call