Abstract
In industrial practice, hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) is commonly triggered by jetting either reagent solution or pulp. Although both methods can enhance mineral flotation, are their roles the same? There are few research studies in the field, which severely limits our understanding on mineral flotation combined with HC. Therefore, in this study, the flotation of ultrafine scheelite with HC pretreatments of reagent solution and pulp (abbreviated to be HCPS and HCPP, respectively) was studied and compared through flotation tests, zeta potential analysis, microscope tests, and shear yield stress measurements. The results of flotation tests show that both HCPS and HCPP can enhance the final flotation performance, but in general, HCPP leads to greater improvements on the final flotation recovery. The presence of (hydrophobized) scheelite particles brings extra gas nuclei for the cavitation–flotation system, suggesting that more NBs may be produced in the case of HCPP compared with HCPS. These tiny bubbles remarkably reduce the size distribution of bubbles in the flotation system, thus increasing the particle–bubbles collision probability. Increase in particle aggregation may be another reason why flotation with HCPP results in a higher flotation recovery. The adherence of NBs on hydrophobized particles decreases the (absolute) surface charge of the solids, resulting in a smaller repulsive force among particles and more significant particle aggregation, which is confirmed by the microscope tests and shear yield stress measurements.
Highlights
Scheelite particles are brittle and overground in the grind process [1]
Nanobubbles (NBs), which refer to tiny bubbles that are mostly smaller than a few hundred nanometers, are confirmed to be advantageous to mineral flotation based on theoretical research and industrial practice [5,6]
The residence time of solids in the case of HC pretreatments of pulp (HCPP) is 10 min longer than that of HC pretreatments of reagent solution (HCPS) in the solution containing NBs, we explored and found that its influence on final flotation recovery was just minor
Summary
There are always a large number of micro-granular slimes in the scheelite pulp, which weakens the flotation environment and leads to the loss of the valuable minerals [2]. Decreasing the size of flotation bubbles is regarded as an efficient way to recover the fine fractions [3]. In the past two to three decades, a lot of research work has been carried out on the development of air bubbles’ sparger design to generate bubbles that are small enough to be used for fine minerals flotation. Nanobubbles (NBs), which refer to tiny bubbles that are mostly smaller than a few hundred nanometers, are confirmed to be advantageous to mineral flotation based on theoretical research and industrial practice [5,6]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.