Abstract
Systematic review conclusionThe different surgical flap designs for mandibular third-molar extraction did not have a significantly different impact on postoperative periodontal outcomes of the mandibular second molars with a minimum follow-up period of 3 months.Critical summary assessmentThis systematic review with limited evidence indicated there is no compelling reason to support the use of a particular flap design for impacted mandibular third-molar extraction.Evidence quality ratingLimited. The different surgical flap designs for mandibular third-molar extraction did not have a significantly different impact on postoperative periodontal outcomes of the mandibular second molars with a minimum follow-up period of 3 months.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
