Abstract

Feature selection is very important to obtain meaningful and interpretive clustering results from a clustering analysis. In the application of soil data clustering, there is a lack of good understanding of the response of clustering performance to different features subsets. In the present paper, we analyzed the performance differences between k-means, fuzzy c-means, and spectral clustering algorithms in the conditions of different feature subsets of soil data sets. The experimental results demonstrated that the performances of spectral clustering algorithm were generally better than those of k-means and fuzzy c-means with different features subsets. The feature subsets containing environmental attributes helped to improve clustering performances better than those having spatial attributes and produced more accurate and meaningful clustering results. Our results demonstrated that combination of spectral clustering algorithm with the feature subsets containing environmental attributes rather than spatial attributes may be a better choice in applications of soil data clustering.

Highlights

  • Clustering generally divides a dataset into k sub-clusters such that similar objects are within the same sub-cluster and dissimilar objects are in different sub-clusters [1]

  • The experimental results demonstrated that the performances of spectral clustering algorithm were generally better than those of k-means and fuzzy c-means with different features subsets

  • Our results demonstrated that combination of spectral clustering algorithm with the feature subsets containing environmental attributes rather than spatial attributes may be a better choice in applications of soil data clustering

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Clustering generally divides a dataset (in which each data object has certain attributes) into k sub-clusters such that similar objects are within the same sub-cluster and dissimilar objects are in different sub-clusters [1]. To obtain good clustering results, we normally require relevant features to be included in the training data and an appropriate clustering method

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.