Abstract

Seismic prediction was considered impossible, however, there are no reasons in theoretical physics that explicitly prevent this possibility. Therefore, it is quite likely that prediction is made stubbornly complicated by practical difficulties such as the quality of catalogs and data analysis. Earthquakes are sometimes forewarned by precursors, and other times they come unexpectedly; moreover, since no unique mechanism for nucleation was proven to exist, it is unlikely that single classical precursors (e.g., increasing seismicity, geochemical anomalies, geoelectric potentials) may ever be effective in predicting impending earthquakes. For this reason, understanding the physics driving the evolution of fault systems is a crucial task to fine-tune seismic prediction methods and for the mitigation of seismic risk. In this work, an innovative idea is inspected to establish the proximity to the critical breaking point. It is based on the mechanical response of faults to tidal perturbations, which is observed to change during the “seismic cycle”. This technique allows to identify different seismic patterns marking the fingerprints of progressive crustal weakening. Destabilization seems to arise from two different possible mechanisms compatible with the so called preslip patch, cascade models and with seismic quiescence. The first is featured by a decreasing susceptibility to stress perturbation, anomalous geodetic deformation, and seismic activity, while on the other hand, the second shows seismic quiescence and increasing responsiveness. The novelty of this article consists in highlighting not only the variations in responsiveness of faults to stress while reaching the critical point, but also how seismic occurrence changes over time as a function of instability. Temporal swings of correlation between tides and nucleated seismic energy reveal a complex mechanism for modulation of energy dissipation driven by stress variations, above all in the upper brittle crust. Some case studies taken from recent Greek seismicity are investigated.

Highlights

  • Experimental and numerical simulations show that disorder plays a key role in driving stress accumulation in the crust and energy nucleation during earthquakes [1], it was not clarified yet how stress variations trigger breaking processes in such heterogeneous media

  • In this work we focus on the possibility of highlighting the growth of critical states in the crust induced by stress accumulation in rocks through the measurement of correlations between some features of the tidal perturbation and seismic activity

  • To mechanical engineering studies delving into the periodic supervision of facilities to detect signals of progressive weakening or corrosion, it is possible that seismicity could show significant variations in the correlation between seismic activity and stress modulations before a major event

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Experimental and numerical simulations show that disorder plays a key role in driving stress accumulation in the crust and energy nucleation during earthquakes [1], it was not clarified yet how stress variations trigger breaking processes in such heterogeneous media. Earthquakes can be due to several stress sources, such as magmatic intrusion or overpressured liquids; faulting is affected by temperature, confining and pore pressure, and rock brittleness This is why the comprehension of the response of faulting to additional stress was so actively investigated for 50 years. There are a few exogenous stress sources useful for this purpose: fluid injection is a widespread technique in stimulating production from oil and natural gas wells and improve geothermal energy generation. It is usually associated with microseismicity, several events with moderate magnitudes were related to this practice [2]. This method is useful only for stress pulses simulations

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.