Different efficacy in myopia control: Comparison between orthokeratology and defocus-incorporated multiple segment lenses

Abstract

PurposeTo compare the efficiency of orthokeratology (OK) and defocus-incorporated multiple segment (DIMS) lenses in myopia control in children. MethodsThis prospective study involved 540 subjects (7–14 years) categorized into three groups: DIMS lenses (180 cases), OK lenses (180 cases), or single-vision spectacles (SVS) (180 cases). After a one-year follow-up, changes in axial length (AL) and differences among the groups were analyzed. The subjects were further divided into a low myopia degree subgroup (LM, −1.50 D ≤ SE ≤ −0.50 D), a moderate myopia degree subgroup (MM, −3.00 D ≤ SE ＜ −1.50 D), and a high myopia degree subgroup (HM, −5.00 D ≤ SE ＜ −3.00 D). A one-way ANOVA and multiple linear regression analysis were used to compare AL elongation and the factors influencing the different groups. ResultsA total of 496 (92 %) subjects completed the study. The mean AL change in the OK lenses, DIMS lenses, and SVS were 0.20±0.18 mm, 0.30±0.22 mm, and 0.38±0.19 mm, respectively (P < 0.001). In the LM subgroup, the OK and DIMS groups showed similar AL changes, but both exhibited slower changes than the SVS group (P = 0.001). In the MM and HM subgroups, the OK lens performed the shortest AL elongation compared with the DIMS lenses and SVS (P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that the AL change was associated with age (β = −0.038 and P = 0.005), initial AL (β = −0.010 and P = 0.011), initial SE (β = 0.028 and P = 0.007), and interventions using OK lenses (β = −0.172 and P = 0.020) and DIMS lenses (β = −0.089 and P = 0.020). ConclusionOver a one-year treatment period, OK and DIMS lenses can significantly retard AL elongation compared with SVS. In addition, the OK lenses were more effective than the DIMS lenses in controlling AL in patients with higher degrees of myopia.