Different effects on right ventricular function in different etiology of secondary tricuspid regurgitation

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Ministry of Science and Technology, Excutive Yuan, Taiwan Background Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is traditionally classified as primary or secondary TR. The effects of TR on right ventricular (RV) function were not consistent. We hypothesized that secondary TR is not a unique group, sophisticated sub-grouping can be useful for studying effects of TR on RV function. Methods 207 consecutive patients identified as significant TR (moderate and severe) by echocardiography were recruited. Standard measurements for right heart were done according to guideline. Lateral tricuspid annulus systolic tissue velocity (S’) and RV fractional area change (FAC) were used for RV function. We classified these patients into primary TR and 6 subgroups of secondary TR according to a new systemic approach. Results Mean age of subjects was 71.2 ± 14.7 years, and there were 84 (40.6%) male. There were 29 (14%) primary TR. Secondary TR was further classified into 6 groups included 18 (8.7%) pacemaker related, 81 (39.1 %) left heart diseases, 6 (2.9%) congenital heart diseases, 3 (1.4%) RV myopathy, 27 (13.0%) pulmonary hypertension, and 43 (20.8%) idiopathic TR. Among 4 major groups (congenital heart disease and RV myopathy were not included in analysis due to low numbers) of secondary TR, S’ was significant higher in idiopathic TR and RV FAC were higher in pacemaker related and idiopathic TR. RV dysfunction was defined as FAC < 35%. RV dysfunction presented mostly in pulmonary hypertension related TR and leastly in idiopathic TR (59.3% vs. 14%, p <0.001). Multivariate analysis using idiopathic TR as reference and controlled TR maximal velocity, RV end-diastolic area, right atrial area, and severity of TR, left heart disease related TR had higher risk of RV dysfunction (OR 4.178, 95% CI 1.490-11.703, p = 0.007). Conclusions Effects of TR on RV function were different among different subgroups of secondary TR. Left heart disease related TR had highest risk for RV dysfunction. Secondary TR should not be regarded as a single disease.