Abstract

Several animals, including bees, use visual search to distinguish targets of interest and ignore distractors. While bee flower choice is well studied, we know relatively little about how they choose between multiple rewarding flowers in complex floral environments. Two factors that could influence bee visual search for multiple flowers are the saliency (colour contrast against the background) and the reward value of flowers. We here investigated how these two different factors contribute to bee visual search. We trained bees to independently recognize two rewarding flower types that, in different experiments, differed in either saliency, reward value or both. We then measured their choices and attention to these flowers in the presence of distractors in a test without reinforcement. We found that bees preferred more salient or higher rewarding flowers and ignored distractors. When the high-reward flowers were less salient than the low-reward flowers, bees were nonetheless equally likely to choose high-reward flowers, for the reward and saliency values we used. Bees were also more likely to attend to these high-reward flowers, spending higher inspection times around them and exhibiting faster search times when choosing them. When flowers differed in reward, we also found an effect of the training order with low-reward targets being more likely to be chosen if they had been encountered during the more immediate training session prior to the test. Our results parallel recent findings from humans demonstrating that reward value can attract attention even when targets are less salient and irrelevant to the current task.

Highlights

  • Animal foraging behaviour is very well studied, but research in this area has not often considered more psychological aspects of foraging such as attention and visual search

  • Bumblebees trained on multiple targets can choose the targets in the presence of distractors, without staying flower constant (Nityananda and Pattrick 2013)

  • When targets are matched in both saliency and reward, bees are likely to choose either rewarding target, and switch between them often

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animal foraging behaviour is very well studied, but research in this area has not often considered more psychological aspects of foraging such as attention and visual search. Visual search experiments typically present individuals one target among distractors. Studies have looked at how attention is deployed when more than one instance of a target type is present (Horowitz and Wolfe 2001) or how attention is divided across multiple tasks (Miller 1982). Fewer studies have looked at visual search for multiple object types or categories that are presented simultaneously (Duncan 1980; Huang et al 2007; Kristjánsson et al 2014; Berggren and Eimer 2020). In real life we might well be searching for multiple items at a time, such as say, tomatoes and onions in the supermarket

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call