Different Effects of AT1 Receptor Antagonist and ETA Receptor Antagonist on Ischemia-Induced Norepinephrine Release in Rat Hearts

Abstract

Angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R) antagonist and endothelin type A receptor (ET(A)R) antagonist were compared as regards their effects on ischemia-induced exocytotic or carrier-mediated norepinephrine (NE) release from cardiac sympathetic nerve endings. According to the Langendorff technique, isolated rat hearts were subjected to 20-minute or 40-minute global ischemia followed by 30-minute reperfusion. Candesartan (selective AT1R antagonist) and ABT-627 (selective ET(A)R antagonist) were perfused, beginning 15 minutes before ischemia. Candesartan (10 and 100 nM) and ABT-627 (3 μM) suppressed excessive NE overflow (exocytotic release) in the coronary effluent from the heart exposed to 20-minute ischemia. In addition, these agents improved postischemic cardiac dysfunction. On the other hand, the beneficial effects of ABT-627 (1 and 3 μM) on NE overflow (carrier-mediated release) and cardiac dysfunction were also observed in 40-minute ischemia, whereas those were not improved by treatment with candesartan (10 and 100 nM and 1 μM). These findings suggest that both AT1R antagonist and ET(A)R antagonist have ability to inhibit the exocytotic NE release, but the carrier-mediated NE release induced by prolonged ischemia cannot be avoided by AT1R antagonist. Thus, ET(A)R antagonist may be more useful than AT1R antagonist in the clinical settings of ischemic heart disease.