Abstract

BackgroundRight upper lobectomy (RUL) for lung cancer with different dissecting orders involves the most variable anatomical structures, but no studies have analyzed its effects on postoperative recovery. This study compared the conventional surgical approach, VAB (dissecting pulmonary vessels first, followed by the bronchus), and the alternative surgical approach, aBVA (dissecting the posterior ascending arterial branch first, followed by the bronchus and vessels) on improving surgical feasibility and postoperative recovery for lung cancer patients.MethodsAccording to the surgical approach, consecutive lung cancer patients undergoing RUL were grouped into aBVA and VAB cohorts. Their clinical, pathologic, and perioperative characteristics were collected to compare perioperative outcomes.ResultsThree hundred one patients were selected (109 in the aBVA cohort and 192 in the VAB cohort). The mean operation time was shorter in the aBVA cohort than in the VAB cohort (164 vs. 221 min, P < 0.001), and less blood loss occurred in the aBVA cohort (92 vs. 141 mL, P < 0.001). The rate of conversion to thoracotomy was lower in the aBVA cohort than in the VAB cohort (0% vs. 11.5%, P < 0.001). The mean duration of postoperative chest drainage was shorter in the aBVA cohort than in the VAB cohort (3.6 vs. 4.5 days, P = 0.001). The rates of postoperative complications were comparable (P = 0.629). The median overall survival was not arrived in both cohorts (P > 0.05). The median disease-free survival was comparable for all patients in the two cohorts (not arrived vs. 41.97 months) and for patients with disease recurrences (13.25 vs. 9.44 months) (both P > 0.05). The recurrence models in two cohorts were also comparable for patients with local recurrences (6.4% vs. 7.8%), distant metastases (10.1% vs. 8.3%), and both (1.8% vs. 1.6%) (all P > 0.05).ConclusionsDissecting the right upper bronchus before turning over the lobe repeatedly and dissecting veins via the aBVA approach during RUL would promote surgical feasibility and achieve comparable postoperative recovery for lung cancer patients.

Highlights

  • Right upper lobectomy (RUL) for lung cancer with different dissecting orders involves the most vari‐ able anatomical structures, but no studies have analyzed its effects on postoperative recovery

  • Because of the rapid development of Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) techniques, the surgical approaches used during open thoracotomy can be applied to VATS; but some surgical procedures need further improvements to facilitate VATS owing to its different views of the thorax, the broadened surgical field, and other reasons

  • General characteristics of patients A total of 1142 consecutive patients diagnosed with lung cancer were screened retrospectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Right upper lobectomy (RUL) for lung cancer with different dissecting orders involves the most vari‐ able anatomical structures, but no studies have analyzed its effects on postoperative recovery. Coupled with specific anatomical structures of each lobe, the dissecting order of the pulmonary bronchus, veins, and arteries during VATS may play a vital role in promoting postoperative recovery and prolonging survival. As reported in previous works, most primary lung cancers (29.2%–37.2%) occur in the right upper lobe, and right upper lobectomy (RUL) involves the most complicated hilar anatomical structures and requires various surgical procedures [10, 14,15,16]. Analyzing the effects of different dissecting orders among homogeneous patients requiring RUL would provide more insights about what factors should be paid more emphasis to improve postoperative recovery and prolong survival

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call