Abstract

To identify elements of the human alpha subunit gene necessary for cell-specific expression, we generated an array of block mutations spanning approximately 400 base pairs (bp) of promoter proximal region and examined them using transient transfection analysis in pituitary (alpha T3) and placental (BeWo) cell lines. Comparison of promoter activity in the two cell types revealed both common and unique elements required for transcription in pituitary and placenta. Two strong elements, the cyclic AMP response element (CRE) and the upstream regulatory element (URE), regulate expression of the alpha subunit gene in BeWo cells. In contrast, promoter activity in alpha T3 cells requires an array of weaker elements. These include the CREs, the URE, as well as two previously described elements, pituitary glycoprotein hormone basal element (PGBE) and gonadotrope-specific element (GSE), and two new elements we designated as the alpha basal elements 1 and 2 (alpha BE1 and alpha BE2). These new elements reside between -316 and -302 bp (alpha BE1) and -296 and -285 bp (alpha BE2) of the human alpha subunit promoter and bind distinct proteins designated alpha BP1 and alpha BP2, respectively. Southwestern blot analysis revealed that alpha BE1 specifically binds 54- and 56-kDa proteins. Additional studies disclosed several potential interactions between proteins that bind the CRE and proteins that occupy PGBE, alpha BE1, and alpha BE2, suggesting that gonadotrope-specific expression occurs through a unique composite regulatory element that includes components of the placenta-specific enhancer.

Highlights

  • Human ␣ subunit gene is expressed in both placenta and pituitary, examination of its promoter allows a comparative analysis of the mechanisms involved in directing expression of the same gene to two separate tissues

  • Results from transfection in BeWo cells confirmed that activity of this promoter is regulated by three main elements that lie within the regions disrupted by ␮13 (URE), ␮14, and ␮15 (JRE) (Fig. 2A)

  • Mutations in either the upstream regulatory element (URE) or the cyclic AMP response element (CRE) had a dramatic effect on promoter activity, whereas the effect of the junctional response element (JRE) mutation was less pronounced

Read more

Summary

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Reagents—Only the highest grade reagents were utilized. Reagents and venders include the following: Tris-HCl, NaCl, MgCl2, glycerol, bisacrylamide, potassium acetate, sodium hydroxide, Triton X-100, and boric acid (Fisher); phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, EDTA, and Nonidet P 40 (Sigma); dithiothreitol, acrylamide, and SDS (Boehringer Mannheim); lipofectamine, HEPES, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium, horse serum, fetal bovine serum, penicillin/streptomycin, and Waymouths media (Life Technologies, Inc.); nucleotides and poly(dI-dC): poly(dI-dC) (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.); ethanol (Aaper, Shelbyville, KY); restriction enzymes and T4 polynucleotide kinase (Life Technologies, Inc. or Boehringer Mannheim); and radionucleotides were purchased from DuPont NEN. The reaction mixtures were precipitated with ethanol, and the DNA was redissolved in the appropriate restriction enzyme buffer and digested with restriction enzymes compatible with both the H␣(Ϫ845)Luc cloning vector and the restriction enzyme common to both mutant primers. H␣(Ϫ1500)␮8/␮11 contains the 600-bp SnaBI-BglII fragment of ␮8 cloned into the analogous site of ␮11. The day after seeding, the cells were transfected using lipofectamine reagent according to the manufacturer’s suggestions (Life Technologies, Inc.). 7 ␮g of ␣T3 nuclear extract was incubated with 25–50 fmol of radiolabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide in the presence of 10 mM MgCl2, 25 mM KCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 12.5 mM HEPES (7.9), 0.5% Triton X-100, 200 ng of Escherichia coli DNA, 200 ng of salmon sperm DNA, 10% glycerol, and 1.0 ␮g of poly(dI-dC):(dI-dC) in a 20-␮l reaction volume. Prestained molecular weight markers (Life Technologies, Inc.) were used to estimate the molecular weights of the proteins

RESULTS
EMSA in the presence of competitor oligonucleotides that
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call