Differences in the prognostic implication of ground-glass opacity on CT according to pathological nodal status in lung cancers treated with lobectomy or pneumonectomy.

Abstract

To clarify the prognostic significance of a ground-glass opacity (GGO) component according to T category and pathological nodal status in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients who underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy for NSCLC between July 2010 and December 2017 were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into GGO and solid groups based on the presence of a GGO component on CT. The effects on survival of interactions between GGO and (a) pathological nodal status (pN) and (b) cT category were evaluated using Cox regression. Out of 1545 patients, 548 were classified into the GGO group (pN0: 457, pN1/2: 91) and 997 into the solid group (pN0: 660, pN1/2: 337). There were interactions between the presence of GGO and pathological nodal status on 5-year disease-free survival (DFS; p = .006) and 5-year overall survival (OS; p = .02). In multivariate analysis, better survival of patients in the GGO group than in the solid group was observed only in pN0 category (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 for 5-year DFS; p = .002 and 0.47 for 5-year OS; p = .002), but not in pN1/2 category. Moreover, in those with pN0 category, the favorable prognostic value of GGO was limited to those with cT1 category for 5-year DFS (adjusted HR, 0.48; p < .001) and those with cT1/2 category for 5-year OS (adjusted HR, 0.37; p = .002). GGO was a favorable predictor of survival only in patients with pN0 category, showing an advantage in DFS for those with cT1 category and OS for those with cT1/2 category. • The presence of ground-glass opacity was associated with a favorable prognosis, only in pathological node-negative patients (5-year disease-free survival, p = .002; 5-year overall survival, p = .002). • Within pathological node-negative patients, the effect of ground-glass opacity on 5-year disease-free survival was valid in patients with cT1 category (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.72; p < .001), but not in patients with cT2 or above category. • Within pathological node-negative patients, the effect of ground-glass opacity on 5-year overall survival was valid in patients with cT1/2 category (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.68; p = .002), but not in patients with cT3/4 category.