Abstract

This study aimed to examine area differences in the prevalence of and factors associated with frailty. This cross-sectional study included metropolitan (eastern and western areas), suburban (districts A and B), and rural areas of Japan (n = 9182, woman 50.9%). Frailty was defined by using a standardized questionnaire comprising three subcategories (fall, nutritional status, and social activities). The prevalence of frailty in the five areas was 14.2% to 30.6% for men and 11.5% to 21.4% for women. The areas with a high frailty prevalence had a significantly lower nutritional status or social activity, or both. Compared to the western metropolitan area, among men, the multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) of frailty was significantly higher in the eastern metropolitan area and lower in suburban district A, and among women, the eastern metropolitan and rural areas had significantly higher APRs. Area-stratified multiple Poisson regression analysis showed that age, bone and joint disease, and a subjective economic status were associated with frailty in most areas and that some factors were area-specific, i.e., living alone (for men living in metropolitan areas) and underweight (for women living in suburban areas). The frailty prevalence differed by area, even after multivariable adjustment. Area-specific characteristics and factors associated with frailty may result in area differences.

Highlights

  • Many countries aim to increase the life expectancy, and, in the future, the extension of a healthy lifespan will be a priority [1]

  • This study examined area differences in frailty prevalence in multivariable-adjusted models and attempted to identify factors associated with frailty in those areas

  • An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for factors associated with frailty was used to compare scores for Kaigo-Yobo Checklist (KYCL) subcategories

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many countries aim to increase the life expectancy, and, in the future, the extension of a healthy lifespan will be a priority [1]. One target for extending a healthy lifespan is frailty—a state of increased vulnerability that can lead to adverse health outcomes, such as disability, hospitalization, and death [2]. A meta-analysis using different definitions of frailty (i.e., phenotype, deficit accumulation, and multidomain models) found that frailty was a significant predictor of adverse health outcomes, regardless of definition [3]. Frailty is an important public health issue [4]. Previous multinational studies have reported a wide range in the frailty prevalence, which suggests that it differs by area [5,6,7]. Two national surveys reported an urban/rural difference [8,9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call