Differences in seasons and rice varieties provide opportunities for improving nitrogen use efficiency and management in irrigated rice in Kenya

Joseph P Gweyi-Onyango,Richard Mose,Symon Njinju,Mekonnen Giweta,Cargele Masso,Andrew Ogollaegesa,Winnie Ntinyari

doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac03dd

Abstract

Apart from nitrogen (N) rates, N use efficiency (NUE) (yield N/total input N) is affected by seasons, crop developmental stages, and varieties. Knowledge of how these factors affect NUE in rice production in Kenya is limited. Therefore, field experiments were conducted with ‘low rates’ of N (simulating farmers’ practices) of 0, 26, 52 and 78 kg N ha−1 with five varieties (MWUR1, MWUR4, IRAT109, NERICA4 and NERICA10) and higher rates of N (125, 175, and 225 kg N ha−1) simulating researchers’ doses with two lowland varieties (Basmati 370 and BW 196) and IR 72. Another experiment on NUE responses to sites, N rates and dose (split or full dose) was undertaken with the IR97 variety. With the ‘low rate’, yields increased with incremental N rates up to 52 Kg N ha−1 and declined (during cold periods, for some varieties). In this scenario, the N agronomic efficiencies (AEN) declined with increasing N but depended on sites and seasons. However, most AEN values were above 100, implying nutrient mining. In most cases (except at the Mwea site), the N utilization efficiency (NUtE) ranged from 16 to 22kg kg−1 and were not significantly affected by sources and methods of N application. In all cases, an increase in N elicited declining trends in NUtE. Moreover, N uptake efficiency ranged between 22 and 90kg kg−1 without significant variation among varieties. For the ‘high N rates’, high biomass yield resulted in higher grain yields in BW 196 and IR 72 but yield declined beyond 75 kg ha−1 N rates due to poor grain filling, particularly when a cold period coincided with booting and grain filling. We conclude that N rates, doses and rice varieties are key determinants of AEN and NUtE in contrasting rice growing seasons in Kenya. Cropping seasons and rice varieties are therefore potential key determinants of sustainable rice productivity and improved NUE in rice-based systems in the studied regions of Kenya.

Highlights

In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), rice is the most rapidly expanding food crop for both consumption and commercial purposes (Tsujimoto et al 2019)
N fertilizer management is very important for improving N use efficiency (NUE), crop productivity and the reduction of N losses to the environment
In the current study, cropping season, rice verities, N application methods, rates and source had a significant impact on the NUE and its components

Summary

Introduction

In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), rice is the most rapidly expanding food crop for both consumption and commercial purposes (Tsujimoto et al 2019). According to the USDA report (2018), the milled grain yield of rice has tripled from 9.2 to 31.5 Mt between 1990 and 2018, largely due to increased use of synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizer. It is anticipated that with the current growth in population and rapid urbanization, there will be a need for increased rice production to meet the consumption demands Rice production in Kenya only meets 16% of the total country’s demand. The major factors contributing towards a lower rice yield in Kenya, and in Africa in general, include, but are not limited to: a lower yield potential (according to Emitiyagoda et al (2010)) (where yield potential is ‘the maximum yield that a variety can reach under the best environment’) of rice genotypes, a lack of fertilizer inputs, drought and poor water control, low-nutrient soils, poor soil fertility management, a shortage of labour and a high incidence of pests, weeds and diseases (Saito et al 2013, Kajisa 2016)

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion