Abstract

PurposeThe Adult Strabismus Quality of Life Questionnaire (AS-20) and the Amblyopia & Strabismus Questionnaire (A&SQ) both measure health-related quality of life in strabismus patients. We evaluated to what extent these instruments cover similar domains by identifying the underlying quality-of-life factors of the combined questionnaires.MethodsParticipants were adults from a historic cohort with available orthoptic childhood data documenting strabismus and/or amblyopia. They had previously completed the A&SQ and were now asked to complete the AS-20. Factor analysis was performed on the correlation-matrix of the combined AS-20 and A&SQ data to identify common underlying factors. The identified factors were correlated with the clinical variables of angle of strabismus, degree of binocular vision, and visual acuity of the worse eye.ResultsOne hundred ten patients completed both questionnaires (mean age, 44 years; range, 38–51 years). Six factors were found that together explained 78% of the total variance. The factor structure was dominated by the first four factors. One factor contained psychosocial and social-contact items, and another factor depth-perception items from both questionnaires. A third factor contained seven items—only from the AS-20—on eye strain, stress, and difficulties with reading and with concentrating. A fourth factor contained seven items—only from the A&SQ—on fear of losing the better eye and visual disorientation, specific for amblyopia. Current visual acuity of the worse eye correlated with depth-perception items and vision-related items, whereas current binocular vision correlated with psychosocial and social-contact items, in 93 patients.ConclusionsFactor analysis suggests that the AS-20 and A&SQ measure a similar psychosocial quality-of-life domain. However, functional problems like avoidance of reading, difficulty in concentrating, eye stress, reading problems, inability to enjoy hobbies, and need for frequent breaks when reading are represented only in the AS-20. During the development of the A&SQ, asthenopia items were considered insufficiently specific for strabismus and were excluded a priori. The patients who generated the items for the AS-20 had, in majority, adulthood-onset strabismus and diplopia and were, hence, more likely to develop such complaints than our adult patients with childhood-onset strabismus and/or amblyopia.

Highlights

  • It is widely accepted that amblyopia and strabismus have negative effects on quality of life, in children and throughout adulthood [1]

  • Factor analysis suggests that the AS-20 and Amblyopia & Strabismus Questionnaire (A&SQ) measure a similar psychosocial quality-of-life domain

  • During the development of the A&SQ, asthenopia items were considered insufficiently specific for strabismus and were excluded a priori

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is widely accepted that amblyopia and strabismus have negative effects on quality of life, in children and throughout adulthood [1]. The AS-20 was developed using two samples of adult patients who came for treatment with a median age of 39.5 years and of 51 years, respectively [4, 5]. This instrument was developed by Hatt et al using an inductive method (grouping of descriptions): Thirty adult patients seeking medical attendance, the majority of whom reported diplopia, gave the input on 11 open-ended questions to generate 1301 quality-of-life phrases [4]. The A&SQ was developed by an expert focus group and validated among adults with childhood strabismus and/or amblyopia with a mean age of 36 years) [3]. The six factors overlapped with four out of the five pre-hypothesized A&SQ domains

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call