Abstract
BackgroundRecently, attempts have been made to use the pulse rate variability (PRV) as a surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV). PRV, however, may be caused by the fluctuations of left ventricular pre-ejection period and pulse transit time besides HRV. We examined whether PRV differs not only from HRV but also depending on the measurement site.ResultsIn five healthy subjects, pulse waves were measured simultaneously on both wrists and both forearms together with single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in the supine and sitting positions. Although average pulse interval showed no significant difference from average R-R interval in either positions, PRV showed greater power for the low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components and lower LF/HF than HRV. The deviations of PRV from HRV in the supine and sitting positions were 13.2% and 7.9% for LF power, 24.5% and 18.3% for HF power, and − 15.0% and − 30.2% for LF/HF, respectively. While the average pulse interval showed 0.8% and 0.5% inter-site variations among the four sites in the supine and sitting positions, respectively, the inter-site variations in PRV were 4.0% and 3.6% for LF power, 3.8% and 4.7% for HF power, and 18.0% and 17.5% for LF/HF, respectively.ConclusionsThese suggest that PRV shows not only systemic differences from HRV but also considerable inter-site variations.
Highlights
With the spread of wearable pulse wave sensors in recent years, pulse wave signals are used to measure pulse rate and to analyze pulse rate variability (PRV) as a surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV) [1, 2]
Question 2 is whether these mechanisms result in only systemic differences between PRV and HRV, or in inter-site variations among PRVs measured at different sites
Mean pulse interval and mean R-R interval did not differ significantly, the LF and HF power were greater and LF/ HF were smaller in PRV than in HRV in both supine and sitting positions (Table 1)
Summary
With the spread of wearable pulse wave sensors in recent years, pulse wave signals are used to measure pulse rate and to analyze pulse rate variability (PRV) as a surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV) [1, 2]. In contrast to HRV, which reflects variations in the ventricular myocardial electrical excitation cycle, PRV. Question 2 is whether these mechanisms result in only systemic differences between PRV and HRV, or in inter-site variations among PRVs measured at different sites. Attempts have been made to use the pulse rate variability (PRV) as a surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV). We examined whether PRV differs from HRV and depending on the measurement site
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.