Abstract

BackgroundThe adaptive maintenance of flower color variation is frequently attributed to pollinators partly because they preferentially visit certain flower phenotypes. We tested whether Gentiana lutea—which shows a flower color variation (from orange to yellow) in the Cantabrian Mountains range (north of Spain)—is locally adapted to the pollinator community.MethodsWe transplanted orange-flowering individuals to a population with yellow-flowering individuals and vice versa, in order to assess whether there is a pollination advantage in the local morph by comparing its visitation rate with the foreign morph.ResultsOur reciprocal transplant experiment did not show clear local morph advantage in overall visitation rate: local orange flowers received more visits than foreign yellow flowers in the orange population, while both local and foreign flowers received the same visits in the yellow population; thus, there is no evidence of local adaptation in Gentiana lutea to the pollinator assemblage. However, some floral visitor groups (such as Bombus pratorum, B. soroensis ancaricus and B. lapidarius decipiens) consistently preferred the local morph to the foreign morph whereas others (such as Bombus terrestris) consistently preferred the foreign morph.DiscussionWe concluded that there is no evidence of local adaptation to the pollinator community in each of the two G. lutea populations studied. The consequences for local adaptation to pollinator on G. lutea flower color would depend on the variation along the Cantabrian Mountains range in morph frequency and pollinator community composition.

Highlights

  • Floral evolution is primarily driven by pollinators (Bradshaw & Schemske, 2003; Whittall &Hodges, 2007), and the diversity of angiosperms in floral attributes, such as flower color, could be related with transitions in these traits (Rausher, 2008), as a result of different selective pressures exerted by pollinators with strong preferences for certain characteristics (Schemske & Bradshaw, 1999; Streisfeld & Kohn, 2007) or by changes in pollinator community composition (Ellis & Johnson, 2009)

  • Our reciprocal transplant experiment showed no clear signal of local morph advantage at one site; there is no evidence of local adaptation in Gentiana lutea to the pollinator assemblage

  • We concluded that there is no evidence of local adaptation to the pollinator community in each of the two G. lutea populations studied

Read more

Summary

Introduction

2007), and the diversity of angiosperms in floral attributes, such as flower color, could be related with transitions in these traits (Rausher, 2008), as a result of different selective pressures exerted by pollinators with strong preferences for certain characteristics (Schemske & Bradshaw, 1999; Streisfeld & Kohn, 2007) or by changes in pollinator community composition (Ellis & Johnson, 2009). Many studies support that animal pollinator preferences may cause selective pressures on flower color, which may fluctuate depending on the structure and/or composition of pollinator community (Melendez-Ackerman & Campbell, 1998; Gómez & Zamora, 2000) In this context, reciprocal transplant experiments will be a powerful tool to assess how changes in flower color preferences of the pollinator assemblage contribute to generate an adaptive advantage of the local morph respect to the foreign morphs, comparing between populations (Streisfeld & Kohn, 2007). Gentiana lutea – which shows a flower color variation (from orange to yellow) in the Cantabrian Mountains range (north of Spain) − is locally adapted to the pollinator community

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call