Differences in nutrient limitation and grazer suppression of phytoplankton in seepage and drainage lakes of the Adirondack region, NY, U.S.A

Abstract

1. For seepage and drainage lakes of the Adirondack mountain region (NY, U.S.A) hydrologic regime is correlated with physical and chemical differences that can affect phytoplankton and planktonic food webs (e.g. presence and influence of wetlands, dissolved organic carbon concentration, anoxia, nutrient cycling). We conducted short‐term (48 h), in situ enclosure experiments to evaluate the relative importance of macrozooplankton grazing and nutrient limitation of phytoplankton biomass in small Adirondack seepage and drainage lakes (N = 18, 1–137 ha). Epilimnetic dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and pH values represented the diversity of the region. We measured chlorophyll a changes in response to grazer removal (> 120 μm) and nutrient addition (∼ 10× ambient N, P, or N + P), and evaluated changes with respect to in situ light, temperature, NO3, NH4, SRP, and crustacean assemblage characters.2. Nutrient addition stimulated significant increase in chlorophyll a concentration at 11 of 18 sites (GLM, Tukey–Kramer). Phytoplankton of clearwater drainage lakes were P‐limited, whereas clearwater and brownwater seepage lakes responded to additions of N and/or N + P. Relative light availability explained half the variance in response to nutrient addition in drainage (r2 = 0.48), but not seepage lake experiments (P > 0.05).3. We observed responses to grazer removal at eight of 18 sites, usually clearwater drainage lakes. Crustacean grazing may be as significant as nutrient limitation of [chl a] for many drainage lake phytoplankton assemblages. Responses were related to in situ density of zooplankton only in drainage lakes. Light explained some variability in response to grazer removal for drainage (r2 = 0.35) and seepage lake experiments (r2 = 0.35).4. These experiments provide evidence that hydrology may ultimately play an important role in determining nutrient and grazer regulation of phytoplankton. Proximate mechanisms affecting our results may be associated with differences in wetland vegetation, [DOC], and nutrient cycling.