Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in women. Surveys show that physicians have an influence in the rates of colorectal screening. This study investigates whether a lack of colorectal screening knowledge prevents Ob/Gyns of different academic levels and practice types from effectively screening colorectal cancer. METHODS: An IRB approved, validated survey eliciting colorectal screening guidelines, practices, and potential barriers to screening was circulated online, at the National Medical Association national conference, ACOG District II conference, and the New York City Health + Hospitals/Metropolitan Dept of Ob/Gyn between October 2018 to January 2019. RESULTS: A total of 142 respondents answered the survey. Only one out of 142 respondents (0.7%) answered correctly the question which identified all of the risk factors for colorectal cancer. A significant difference was noted in correctly identifying risk factors when comparing attendings (36.6%) and residents (75%) P=.004. Most respondents were able to correctly identify age to start screening (93.6%), but fewer were able to correctly identify age to stop screening (23.2%). For screening intervals, 76.8% correctly answered for colonoscopy, 66.9% correctly answered for flexible sigmoidoscopy. A significant difference was noted after stratifying for age (ages 20-40 vs 50-70s P=.003), gender (women vs men P=.01), and academic level (resident vs attending P=.03): younger, resident, and female physicians provided more correct answers. CONCLUSION: Difference in colorectal cancer screening knowledge between residents and attendings contributes to less than effective screening. Education on colorectal cancer should focus on attendings through maintenance of certification and continued integration in residency education.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.