Abstract

Previously, 4-alkyl and 4-aryl substituted analogues of the low-efficacy partial GABA A receptor agonist 5-(4-piperidyl)-3-isothiazole (4-PIOL) have been identified as competitive GABA A receptor antagonists. These structurally related competitive antagonists show marked differences in their kinetic properties. The kinetics of 20 4-alkyl and 4-aryl substituted analogues of 4-PIOL, two 4-arylalkyl substituted 3-isothiazolol analogues and the classical GABA A receptor antagonist SR95531 was studied in cultured cerebral cortical neurons using whole-cell patch-clamp techniques. The kinetics of the antagonists was studied indirectly by measuring the changes in the response of the full GABA A receptor agonist isoguvacine ( IGU) induced by concurrent application of an antagonist. When added, the majority of the antagonists did not affect the rate of deactivation of the IGU-induced responses. When removed, however, the majority of the antagonists slowed the reactivation phase of IGU implying that the dissociation of the antagonist from the GABA A receptor is the rate-limiting step. Surprisingly, the functional off-rates of the antagonists seemed to correlate better with the lipophilicity of the compounds than with the affinity and potency. This suggests that the dissociation of the tested antagonists from the GABA A receptor is restricted by lipophilic interactions, perhaps with the aromatic amino acids surrounding the GABA binding site.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.