Differences in electromyographic activity of biceps brachii and brachioradialis while performing three variants of curl.

Giuseppe Marcolin,Tatiana Moro,Antonio Paoli,Davide Piccolo,Fausto Antonio Panizzolo,Nicola Petrone,Davide Grigoletto

doi:10.7717/peerj.5165

Abstract

BackgroundDumbbell curl (DC) and barbell curl in its two variants, straight (BC) or undulated bar (EZ) are typical exercises to train the elbow flexors. The aim of the study was to verify if the execution of these three variants could induce a selective electromyographic (EMG) activity of the biceps brachii (BB) and brachioradialis (BR).MethodsTwelve participants performed one set of ten repetitions at 65% of their 1-RM for each variant of curl. Pre-gelled electrodes were applied with an inter-electrode distance of 24 mm on BB and BR. An electrical goniometer was synchronously recorded with EMG signals to determine the concentric and eccentric phases of each variant of curl.ResultsWe detected higher activation profile of both BB (P < 0.05) and BR (P < 0.01) during the EZ compared to the DC. Higher levels of activation was found during the concentric phase for only the BR performed with an EZ compared to DC (P < 0.001) and performing BC compared to DC (P < 0.05). The eccentric phase showed a higher activation of the BB muscle in EZ compared to DC (P < 0.01) and in BC compared to DC (P < 0.05). The BR muscle showed a higher activation performing EZ compared to DC (P < 0.01).DiscussionThe EZ variant may be preferred over the DC variant as it enhances BB and BR EMG activity during the whole range of motion and only in the eccentric phase. The small difference between BC and EZ variants of the BB and BR EMG activity makes the choice between these two exercises a matter of subjective comfort.

Highlights

Resistance training has fundamental importance in improving athletic performance as it allows the increase of muscular strength, power and speed (Kraemer & Ratamess, 2004)
Considering the whole range of motion (Fig. 4A) significant differences were observed in the EMG activity of the biceps brachii (BB) (P = 0.0204) and BR (P = 0.0023)
A post hoc test showed a higher activation during the EZ variant with respect to the Dumbbell curl (DC) both for BB (P < 0.05, ES = 0.30) and BR (P < 0.01, ES = 0.51)

Summary

Introduction

Resistance training has fundamental importance in improving athletic performance as it allows the increase of muscular strength, power and speed (Kraemer & Ratamess, 2004) In strength athletes such as bodybuilders, resistance training plays a key role as it induces muscle hypertrophy. How to cite this article Marcolin et al (2018), Differences in electromyographic activity of biceps brachii and brachioradialis while performing three variants of curl. These training approaches have been investigated in both lower and upper body exercises which target specific muscle groups. The small difference between BC and EZ variants of the BB and BR EMG activity makes the choice between these two exercises a matter of subjective comfort

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion