Abstract

The human brain is a system consisting of various interconnected neural networks, with functional specialization coexisting with functional integration occurring both; temporally and spatially at many levels. The current study ranked and compared fast and slow participants in processing information by assessing latency and amplitude of early and late Event-Related Potential (ERP) components, including P200, N200, Premotor Potential (PMP) and P300. In addition, the Reaction Time (RT) of participants was compared and related to the respective ERP components. For this purpose, twenty right-handed and healthy individuals were subjected to a classical ERP “Oddball” paradigm. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Discriminant Function analyses (DFA) used PRE components and the Reaction Time (RT) to classify individuals. Our results indicate that latencies of P200 (O2 electrode), N200 (O2), PMP (C3) and P300 (Pz) components are significantly reduced in the group of fast responding participants. In addition, the P200 amplitude is significantly increased in the group of fast responding participants. Based on these findings, we suggest that the ERP is able to detect even minimal impairments, in the processing of somatosensory information and cognitive and motor stages. Hence, the study of ERP might also be capable of assessing sensorimotor dysfunctions in healthy old-aged people and in neuropsychiatric patients (suffering from dementia, Parkinson’s disease, and other neurological disorders).

Highlights

  • The human brain is a system consisting of various neural networks of multiple connectivity, with functional specialization coexisting with functional integration occurring both temporally and spatially at many levels [1]

  • The statistical analysis revealed that the Reaction Time (RT) of the fast group was significantly reduced when compared to the RT of the slow group (p = 0.001; mean fast = 366.583, SD fast = 27.301; mean slow = 414.625, SD slow = 31.075) (Figure 1A)

  • Statistical analysis revealed that the latency of the P200 component of the fast group was significantly reduced when compared to the slow group (p = 0.015; mean fast = 192.500, SD fast = 27.301; mean slow = 213.4375, SD slow = 31.075) (Figures 1B, 2A and 3A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The human brain is a system consisting of various neural networks of multiple connectivity, with functional specialization coexisting with functional integration occurring both temporally and spatially at many levels [1]. Traditionally used in Event-Related Potential (ERP) studies, are ideal assessments of how the brain discriminates stimuli and processes probability, thereby being directly related to models of cognitive processing [2]. Stimuli at a higher level of processing, represented by premotor potential (PMP) and the P300 wave [5] Based on this rationale, in which the processing of sensory inputs plays a significant role for the cognitive and motor performance, the current study aimed to compare fast and slow responding participants by assessing both the latency and amplitude of early and late ERP components, including P200, N200, Premotor Potential (PMP) and P300 in the context of a visual oddball paradigm

Experimental procedures
Results
Discussion
Polich J
21. Hsieh S
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call