Abstract

Animal personalities, composed of axes of consistent individual behaviors, are widely reported and can have important fitness consequences. However, despite theoretical predictions that life-history trade-offs may cause and maintain personality differences, our understanding of the evolutionary ecology of personality remains poor, especially in long-lived species where trade-offs and senescence have been shown to be stronger. Furthermore, although much theoretical and empirical work assumes selection shapes variation in personalities, studies exploring the genetic underpinnings of personality traits are rare. Here we study one standard axis of personality, the shy–bold continuum, in a long-lived marine species, the wandering albatross from Possession Island, Crozet, by measuring the behavioral response to a human approach. Using generalized linear mixed models in a Bayesian framework, we show that boldness is highly repeatable and heritable. We also find strong differences in boldness between breeding colonies, which vary in size and density, suggesting birds are shyer in more dense colonies. These results demonstrate that in this seabird population, boldness is both heritable and repeatable and highlights the potential for ecological and evolutionary processes to shape personality traits in species with varying life-history strategies.

Highlights

  • Behavior is often considered to be a plastic trait, changing with time and context (Westeberhard 1989)

  • Theoretical models predict that life-history trade-offs (LHTs) may drive the evolution of personality differences, as there is a conflict between current and future reproduction (Wolf et al 2007)

  • Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Behavior is often considered to be a plastic trait, changing with time and context (Westeberhard 1989). Theoretical models predict that life-history trade-offs (LHTs) may drive the evolution of personality differences, as there is a conflict between current and future reproduction (Wolf et al 2007). These models predict that individuals who have high potential future reproduction should be risk adverse, as they have a lot to lose, whereas those with low reproductive potential will be risk takers, resulting in variation in behavioral strategies (Wolf et al 2007).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call