Differences in amiodarone efficacy in relation to ejection fraction and basal rhythm in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Abstract

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, data are lacking concerning the association of AF and VAs. This study aimed to clarify the association between AF and VAs and to investigate the effect of amiodarone on the incidence of VAs in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Methods and resultsWe enrolled 612 patients who had ICDs or who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) and classified them into two groups (sinus rhythm [SR] group, n = 427; AF group, n = 185) according to their basal rhythm at enrollment. Patients with paroxysmal AF were grouped into the AF group. The incidence of VAs, i.e., ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF), was significantly lower in the AF group than in the SR group (0.54 vs 0.95 episodes/person/year, P = 0.032). Furthermore, amiodarone use was significantly higher in the AF group than in the SR group (P = 0.003). Non-use of amiodarone was associated with a significant increase in the occurrence of VT/VF in the two groups. This beneficial suppressive effect of amiodarone on the incidence of VT/VF was present in the AF group regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, this effect of amiodarone was present only in patients with LVEF ≥ 40% in the SR group. ConclusionsAmiodarone was negatively associated with VT/VF occurrence and was frequently used in ICD/CRT-D patients with AF. VT/VF was controlled by amiodarone in all cases in the AF group but only in patients with an LVEF ≥ 40% in the SR group.