Differences between REM and NREM sleepiness measured by event-related potentials (P300, CNV), MSLT and subjective estimate in narcolepsy-cataplexy

Abstract

Differences between ‘REM sleepiness’ and ‘NREM sleepiness’ states in wakefulness studied respectively prior to REM-containing and NREM-only multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) naps were compared by complex evoked potentials (P300, CNV), subjective estimate (Stanford Sleepiness Scale, SSS) and MSLT measures in 12 untreated patients with narcolepsy-cataplexy. The EP paradigms lasted about 7 min each and were done during the 10 min immediately before MSLT naps at 10.00, 12.00, 14.00, 16.00 and 18.00 h. SSS forms were completed immediately before and after the EP studies and MSLT naps. Patients were studied on 2 days and performed either the P300 or CNV paradigm on each day. ‘REM sleepiness’ was found to be subjectively and objectively (shorter mean sleep latency on MSLT) greater. Although subjects were sleepier in REM sleepiness, the subsequent REM nap was relatively more refreshing and reduced SSS estimates to levels equivalent to those after NREM-only naps. EP measures also showed differences between the 2 sleepiness states. REM sleepiness was associated with a significantly larger P2 component (in both the P300 paradigm and the CNV paradigm), a strong but not significant trend towards reduced amplitude of the P3 component, and almost total suppression of the slow negative components of the CNV. REM sleepiness and NREM sleepiness therefore appear to be distinct and differentiable cerebral states.