Abstract

BackgroundMany self-harmers do not present in hospitals due to the self-harm. It is still unclear on the differences between medically treated and untreated self-harm in China. This study described the differences of the two groups of self-harmers using the largest psychological aid hotline data.MethodsThe present observational study recruited 3,403 hotline callers who reported episodes of self-harm before the call. In routine assessment, information about the most recent episode of self-harm was collected, including the method of self-harm, the wish to die, goals of the self-harm, and any medical treatment (irrespective of psychological services) in the hospital. The callers were divided into two groups: those who received hospital-based medical treatment due to the most recent self-harm (treated self-harm callers) and those who did not (untreated self-harm callers).ResultsIn the most recent episode of self-harm, 65% (n = 2,217) of callers were untreated and 55% (1,226/2,217) of the untreated self-harm callers reported a wish to die. A total of 67% of the callers reported that their main goal of self-harm was to relieve suffering. The most common self-harm methods were using instruments (knife or rope) and overdosing on medicines. Compared with treated self-harm callers, the untreated self-harm callers were less likely to have a wish to die (OR = 0.57), engage in self-harm outside the home (OR = 0.71 and 0.78), and attribute their self-harm to romantic relationship problems (OR = 0.76); however, they were more likely to use instruments, to jump, or to choose other methods (OR = 3.73, 3.83, and 7.71, respectively).ConclusionsAmong hotline callers, many episodes of self-harm did not receive medical treatment, despite over half reporting a wish to die. Characteristics of self-harm behaviors were different between treated and untreated self-harm callers. Our findings suggest that more strategies should improve access to hospital-based medical treatment and coverage for post-intervention for self-harmers who are not presented in hospitals.

Highlights

  • Self-harm, which refers to intentional bodily self-harm irrespective of motivation and degree of suicide intent, is a global public health problem (Haagsma et al, 2016)

  • While we divided the data into male and female subsamples, the results of the two subsamples indicated similar findings with combined sample, except for the place where self-harm occurred did not associated with receiving medical treatment in either of the male or the female subsample

  • We describe the characteristics of hotline callers and most recent episode of non-fatal self-harm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Self-harm, which refers to intentional bodily self-harm irrespective of motivation and degree of suicide intent, is a global public health problem (Haagsma et al, 2016). Considering the large proportion of untreated acts among self-harm (Geulayov et al, 2018), it is important to explore and understand the characteristics of individuals presenting with self-harm who did not receive hospital-based medical treatment Such an understanding would contribute to developing more specific and effective prevention strategies for the self-harm, and, to some extent, help us estimate the prevalence of non-fatal self-harm in China more accurately. Our findings suggest that more strategies should improve access to hospital-based medical treatment and coverage for post-intervention for self-harmers who are not presented in hospitals

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call