Abstract

BackgroundAberrational epigenetic marks are believed to play a major role in establishing the abnormal features of cancer cells. Rational use and development of drugs aimed at epigenetic processes requires an understanding of the range, extent, and roles of epigenetic reprogramming in cancer cells. Using ChIP-chip and MeDIP-chip approaches, we localized well-established and prevalent epigenetic marks (H3K27me3, H3K4me3, H3K9me3, DNA methylation) on a genome scale in several lines of putative glioma stem cells (brain tumor stem cells, BTSCs) and, for comparison, normal human fetal neural stem cells (fNSCs).ResultsWe determined a substantial “core” set of promoters possessing each mark in every surveyed BTSC cell type, which largely overlapped the corresponding fNSC sets. However, there was substantial diversity among cell types in mark localization. We observed large differences among cell types in total number of H3K9me3+ positive promoters and peaks and in broad modifications (defined as >50 kb peak length) for H3K27me3 and, to a lesser extent, H3K9me3. We verified that a change in a broad modification affected gene expression of CACNG7. We detected large numbers of bivalent promoters, but most bivalent promoters did not display direct overlap of contrasting epigenetic marks, but rather occupied nearby regions of the proximal promoter. There were significant differences in the sets of promoters bearing bivalent marks in the different cell types and few consistent differences between fNSCs and BTSCs.ConclusionsOverall, our “core set” data establishes sets of potential therapeutic targets, but the diversity in sets of sites and broad modifications among cell types underscores the need to carefully consider BTSC subtype variation in epigenetic therapy. Our results point toward substantial differences among cell types in the activity of the production/maintenance systems for H3K9me3 and for broad regions of modification (H3K27me3 or H3K9me3). Finally, the unexpected diversity in bivalent promoter sets among these multipotent cells indicates that bivalent promoters may play complex roles in the overall biology of these cells. These results provide key information for forming the basis for future rational drug therapy aimed at epigenetic processes in these cells.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-724) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Aberrational epigenetic marks are believed to play a major role in establishing the abnormal features of cancer cells

  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay (ChIP)-chip and Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation Assay (MeDIP)-chip in brain tumor stem cells (BTSCs) and fetal neural stem cells (fNSCs) To investigate the distribution of epigenetic marks, we used the 2.1 million probe NimbleGen HD2 microarray, a design centered around promoter regions, most of which are 10 kb in extent with 7 kb upstream and 3 kb downstream of the transcription start site and 100 bp probe spacing

  • We started with the classical approach of examining known sites of modification in our microarray data (Additional file 1: Figures S1-S5). Examination of this data for each mark revealed not just consistent presence of the expected epigenetic mark, and that the waveforms were very similar across different cell types

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aberrational epigenetic marks are believed to play a major role in establishing the abnormal features of cancer cells. Using ChIP-chip and MeDIP-chip approaches, we localized well-established and prevalent epigenetic marks (H3K27me, H3K4me, H3K9me, DNA methylation) on a genome scale in several lines of putative glioma stem cells (brain tumor stem cells, BTSCs) and, for comparison, normal human fetal neural stem cells (fNSCs). It is well-established that epigenetic marks are altered in cancer cells (e.g [1]). There is intense work on developing new drugs aimed at epigenetic processes for cancer treatment and gaining a more detailed understanding of the specific steps involved in the action of these drugs on cancer cells. Gaining a better understanding of epigenetic changes in different types of cancer cells is critical

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.