Difference in the fusion rate and bone formation between artificial bone and iliac autograft inside an inter-body fusion cage – A comparison between porous hydroxyapatite/type 1 collagen composite and autologous iliac bone

Abstract

BackgroundLateral inter-body fusion (LIF) using cages with a large bone grafting space can lead to a shortage of autologous grafting materials. The use of artificial bone is an option to increase the volume of grafting materials. However, the rate of bony fusion for these materials compared to that of autologous bone is unclear. MethodsThe bone fusion rate for artificial bone (HAp/Col) and autologous iliac bone (IBG) graft among 23 patients who had undergone LIF (total 66 disc levels) combined with multilevel posterior corrective fusion for the treatment of adult spinal deformity was retrospectively evaluated. To allow comparison, one of the two separate bone grafting holes in each LIF cage was filled with HAp/Col and the other, with IBG. The change in Hounsfield units (HU) inside the implanted holes at 1-year post surgery (PO1Y) from baseline and immediately after surgery and bony fusion between adjacent vertebrae, defined by the extent of trabecular continuity at PO1Y, were evaluated using computed tomography. Differences between the convex and concave sides as well as effects of the side of approach were investigated. ResultsHU values increased significantly for IBG, from 228.9 at baseline to 286.1 at PO1Y (p < 0.001), with no change for HAp/Col. The fusion rate was higher for IBG (71.2%) than for HAp/Col (19.7%; p < 0.001). A significant effect of the location of the holes on fusion rate was identified for HAp/Col but not IBG. No effects of the side of approach were identified. ConclusionsA higher rate of fusion in LIF cages was obtained with IBG than with HAp/Col, with no effect of location of implantation (convex or concave) for IBG. Therefore, exclusive use of artificial bone, particularly on the convex side, should be avoided during LIF.