Difference analysis in estimating biomass conversion and expansion factors of masson pine in Fujian Province, China based on national forest inventory data: A comparison of three decision tree models of ensemble learning.

Abstract

Biomass conversion and expansion factors (BCEFs) are important parameters for estimating carbon storage in forest biomass. Clarifying the source of differences in estimating BCEFs could reduce uncertainties in forest biomass carbon estimation. The decision tree models of ensemble learning can be used to properly figure out the source of differences in estimating BCEFs. However, the comparison of different decision tree models for analyzing differences in estimating BCEFs has never been reported. In this study, three models [the boosted regression trees (BRT), random forest(RF), and Cubist] and data of 331 masson pine plots from the 8th Chinese National Forest Inventory for Fujian Province were used to analyze the differences in estimating BCEFs (including above- and below-ground). The results showed that BCEFs were following right-skewed distribution, with the mean, minimum and maximum value being 0.69 t·m-3, 0.67 t·m-3 and 0.71 t·m-3, respectively. All three models performed well in BCEFs prediction and fitting, and could explain more than 92.8% variations of BCEFs. All three models showed that average DBH and volume were the top two highest relative importance predictors. BCEFs decreased with the increases of average DBH and volume. Stand characteristics factors, such as average DBH, volume, average age and average height, had great influence on BCEFs. Both soil factors and topographic factors had little influence on BCEFs. Using a few variables (such as average DBH, volume, average age and avera-ge height) which contained more BCEFs prediction information could have preferable forecasting precision when building BCEFs models. Moreover, widely representative samples with different average tree ages, average DBH and volume should be chosen to calculate BCEFs when applying constant BCEFs.