Abstract

This paper examines the problem of diffeomorphic image registration in the presence of differing image intensity profiles and sparsely sampled, missing, or damaged tissue. Our motivation comes from the problem of aligning 3D brain MRI with 100-micron isotropic resolution to histology sections at 1 × 1 × 1,000-micron resolution with multiple varying stains. We pose registration as a penalized Bayesian estimation, exploiting statistical models of image formation where the target images are modeled as sparse and noisy observations of the atlas. In this injective setting, there is no assumption of symmetry between atlas and target. Cross-modality image matching is achieved by jointly estimating polynomial transformations of the atlas intensity. Missing data is accommodated via a multiple atlas selection procedure where several atlas images may be of homogeneous intensity and correspond to “background” or “artifact.” The two concepts are combined within an Expectation-Maximization algorithm, where atlas selection posteriors and deformation parameters are updated iteratively and polynomial coefficients are computed in closed form. We validate our method with simulated images, examples from neuropathology, and a standard benchmarking dataset. Finally, we apply it to reconstructing digital pathology and MRI in standard atlas coordinates. By using a standard convolutional neural network to detect tau tangles in histology slices, this registration method enabled us to quantify the 3D density distribution of tauopathy throughout the medial temporal lobe of an Alzheimer's disease postmortem specimen.

Highlights

  • High-throughput neuroinformatics and image analysis are emerging in neuroscience (Miller et al, 2013a; Mori et al, 2013)

  • At the 1-millimeter scale, there are many atlases, Registration With Intensity Transformation/Anomalies including Tailarach coordinates (Talairach and Szikla, 1980) and the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) (Evans et al, 1993) and Mori’s diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) white matter (Mori et al, 2005) atlases, which define the locations of neuroanatomical structures as well as important structural and functional properties such as volume, shape, blood oxygen leveldependent (BOLD) signals, etc

  • In the work described here, we focus on an application that is ubiquitous in digital pathology, where micron-thick tissue slices are prone to damage and are sparse, implying large numbers of missing sections

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

High-throughput neuroinformatics and image analysis are emerging in neuroscience (Miller et al, 2013a; Mori et al, 2013).

METHODS
Background
EM Algorithm and the Missing Data Problem
Optimization Algorithm
M step
Post-mortem Imaging
Image Mapping Experiments
Mapping Simulated Images With Artifact and Missing Tissue
Mapping Histology With Missing Tissue and Different Stains
Quantitative Analysis on Standardized Benchmark Datasets
Dice Overlap for Whole Brains and Hemispheres
Mapping Histology Data to Mai Atlas Coordinates
CONCLUSION
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.