Abstract

The knowledge of the behaviour of different grapevine rootstocks is basic to achieve a good adaptation of vine to its growing area. With the objective of knowing the agronomic and qualitative response of cv. Sauvignon Blanc to the use of several rootstocks, a trial was established in 2006 in the D.O. Rueda. The vines are vertical trellised, with bilateral Royat cordon pruning, and the vine spacing is 2.60 m × 1.25 m. The row orientation is NNW (N-25°). The experimental design consisted of randomized blocks with 4 replications and elemental plot of 60 vines. Over the period 2010–2014 it has been developed the study of the following 10 rootstocks (treatments): 110R, 101-14M, 420A, 3309C, 41B, 161-49C, 196-17C, Fercal, Gravesac and RGM. The rootstocks 420A and 41B showed a production higher than 50% with respect to 196-17C and 161-49C, and higher to 100% than RGM, due to the number of clusters per vine and, in greater amount, to the cluster weight. Fercal and Gravesac showed an increase of pruning wood weight of 24% with respect to 196-17C and 161-49C, and 90% with respect to RGM, mainly due to the shoot weight. The sugar concentration increased with 101-14M, 196-17C and Fercal, and became reduced with 161-49C, 41B and RGM. The pH of must was reduced with Fercal whereas the titratable acidity increased, which also showed increase with Gravesac and 161-49C. The tartaric acid hardly increased slightly with Fercal and 161-49C, whereas the malic acid increased with Gravesac and Fercal, and was reduced with 41B, 3309C, RGM and 101-14M. The potassium concentration increased with 196-17C, Gravesac and Fercal, and was reduced with 41B, 161-49C, 420A and 3309C. The effects observed show alternatives for rootstock election according to the growing conditions and objectives of the vineyard.

Highlights

  • La utilizacion del portainjerto en el cultivo de la vid tuvo su origen en la lucha contra la filoxera

  • Dichas cualidades suponen criterios anadidos a considerar en la eleccion de portainjerto, como son el vigor que este confiere a la variedad, la influencia sobre el ciclo vegetativo del injerto, la facilidad de estaquillado y de injerto, la adaptacion a condiciones especıficas del lugar y la calidad de la uva [2]

  • “Ten grapevine rootstocks: effects on vegetative development, production and grape quality of cv

Read more

Summary

Introduccion

La utilizacion del portainjerto en el cultivo de la vid tuvo su origen en la lucha contra la filoxera. Dichas cualidades suponen criterios anadidos a considerar en la eleccion de portainjerto, como son el vigor que este confiere a la variedad, la influencia sobre el ciclo vegetativo del injerto, la facilidad de estaquillado y de injerto, la adaptacion a condiciones especıficas del lugar (sequıa, humedad, salinidad, etc.) y la calidad de la uva [2]. La existencia de zonas productoras con diferentes caracterısticas edafoclimaticas sugiere la conveniencia de conocer el funcionamiento de portainjertos alternativos que puedan mejorar la adaptacion del vinedo dependiendo de las condiciones de la zona de cultivo [8]. Se considera conveniente profundizar en el estudio de portainjertos, entre los cuales habrıa que incluir, ademas de los citados 110R y 41B, otros de diferentes caracterısticas, como 140Ru, 1103P, 101-14M, 420A, 5BB, 161-49C, 333EM y SO4, para conocer su influencia en las diversas zonas de Castilla y Leon. Sauvignon Blanc, a traves de la cuantificacion de parametros vegetativos, productivos y de calidad de la uva, en la Denominacion de Origen Rueda, ubicada en el centro de Castilla y Leon

Material y metodos
Produccion de uva
Desarrollo vegetativo
Composicion de la uva
Findings
Conclusiones
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call