Abstract

BackgroundAlthough diet is believed to be a major factor underlying the evolution of venom, few comparative studies examine both venom composition and diet across a radiation of venomous species. Cone snails within the family, Conidae, comprise more than 700 species of carnivorous marine snails that capture their prey by using a cocktail of venomous neurotoxins (conotoxins or conopeptides). Venom composition across species has been previously hypothesized to be shaped by (a) prey taxonomic class (i.e., worms, molluscs, or fish) and (b) dietary breadth. We tested these hypotheses under a comparative phylogenetic framework using ecological data from past studies in conjunction with venom duct transcriptomes sequenced from 12 phylogenetically disparate cone snail species, including 10 vermivores (worm-eating), one molluscivore, and one generalist.ResultsWe discovered 2223 unique conotoxin precursor peptides that encoded 1864 unique mature toxins across all species, >90 % of which are new to this study. In addition, we identified two novel gene superfamilies and 16 novel cysteine frameworks. Each species exhibited unique venom profiles, with venom composition and expression patterns among species dominated by a restricted set of gene superfamilies and mature toxins. In contrast with the dominant paradigm for interpreting Conidae venom evolution, prey taxonomic class did not predict venom composition patterns among species. We also found a significant positive relationship between dietary breadth and measures of conotoxin complexity.ConclusionsThe poor performance of prey taxonomic class in predicting venom components suggests that cone snails have either evolved species-specific expression patterns likely as a consequence of the rapid evolution of conotoxin genes, or that traditional means of categorizing prey type (i.e., worms, mollusc, or fish) and conotoxins (i.e., by gene superfamily) do not accurately encapsulate evolutionary dynamics between diet and venom composition. We also show that species with more generalized diets tend to have more complex venoms and utilize a greater number of venom genes for prey capture. Whether this increased gene diversity confers an increased capacity for evolutionary change remains to be tested. Overall, our results corroborate the key role of diet in influencing patterns of venom evolution in cone snails and other venomous radiations.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2755-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Diet is believed to be a major factor underlying the evolution of venom, few comparative studies examine both venom composition and diet across a radiation of venomous species

  • We examine the influence of both dietary preference and dietary breadth on venom evolution in cone snails (Family: Conidae), a hyper diverse group of over 700 predatory marine snails that typically prey on either worms, molluscs, or fish using a cocktail of venomous neuropeptides [34, 35]

  • We note that C. sponsalis refers one lineage of the C. sponsalis species complex, where a number of described species are comprised of several, paraphyletic lineages [39]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Diet is believed to be a major factor underlying the evolution of venom, few comparative studies examine both venom composition and diet across a radiation of venomous species. Phuong et al BMC Genomics (2016) 17:401 composition across taxa: (1) prey preference should determine venom components and (2), dietary breadth should be positively correlated with venom complexity [4, 11, 12] While both hypotheses are often used interchangeably as evidence for the role of diet in venom evolution (e.g., [11, 13, 14]), they have separate and distinct predictions on patterns of venom composition among taxa: whereas the former hypothesis predicts the types of venom proteins expected for a given species, the latter hypothesis predicts how many proteins are employed for prey capture. Given the high evolutionary lability of venom toxins, it is unclear that a relationship between dietary preference and venom composition should be expected

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call