Abstract
Metabarcoding is emerging as an alternative to morphological methods in noninvasive carnivore diet analysis based on scats. A number of metabarcoding markers have been developed but their comparative performance to recover DNA from scats remains mostly untested. We tested three markers covering a wide taxonomic range of prey items and compared them with the results of a morphological analysis. Morphological and genetic methods performed comparably regarding the identity of detected prey species, but the number of identified species varied strongly between markers. Only one, 12S-V5, amplified successfully in all samples and proved to be robust and reliable when working with the highly degraded DNA obtained from scats.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
