Abstract
Dysregulation of the endogenous acid-base balance can contribute to inflammation and cancer development if metabolic acidosis is sustained. The epidemiologic evidence on the association between diet-dependent acid load and cancer risk is scarce and inconsistent. We aim to explore the possible role of dietary acid load in lung cancer (LC) risk. A case-control study was performed on 843 LC cases and 1466 controls by using a multi-topic questionnaire, including a food frequency questionnaire. Controls were matched to cases by age-frequency, urban/rural residence, and region. Food-derived nutrients were calculated from available databases. The dietary acid load was calculated using validated measures as potential renal acid load (PRAL) score and net endogenous acid production (NEAP) score. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by logistic regression. We found direct associations between dietary acid load and LC risk. The highest quartile of the NEAP score was significantly associated (OR=2.22, ptrend<0.001). The PRAL score displayed similar associations in simpler regression models, but there was no association when a more complex one was used (OR=0.99, ptrend =0.94). The NEAP score was associated with a significant risk increase in all cell types, except for small cell cancers, but the PRAL score did not show any association. The NEAP scores, directly associated with meat intake and inversely associated with plant-based foods intake, suggest that a high acid load dietary style may increase LC risk. Studies focused on food groups, and nutritional patterns are in line with our findings. Although the data shown here represent the first one to be published on this issue, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.