Diet-Responsive Hypercholesterolemia With Cardiofaciocutaneous Syndrome Type 3

Abstract

Background: Molecular basis of diet responsive hypercholesterolemia remains unclear. We report diet-responsive severe hypercholesterolemia in a young female with cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome type 3 (CFC3) due to a heterozygous pathogenic MAP2K1 variant, suggesting a role of common MAPK variants in LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) response to diet. Clinical case: A 3-year-old Caucasian female with CFC3 (macrocephaly, frontal bossing, wide nasal root with depressed bridge, anteverted nares, low set fleshy ears, congenital pulmonic valve stenosis, postnatal growth deficiency, hypotonia, and neurocognitive impairment) due to a de novo heterozygous c.389A>G, p.Tyr130Cys pathogenic variant in MAP2K1, presented with extremely elevated serum total cholesterol of 446 mg/dL, triglycerides of 239 mg/dL, HDL-cholesterol of 53 mg/dL, LDL-C of 335 mg/dL (normal range < 110 mg/dL) and serum apolipoprotein B level 219 mg/dL (normal range < 90 mg/dL). Her LDL-C was 252 mg/dL a year ago and 215 mg/dL one month prior to presentation. Reducing total dietary fat to 20–25% of total energy and saturated fat to <6% of total energy over the next 4 months lowered LDL-C to 104 mg/dL. However, her weight decreased by 0.5 kg and liberalization of fat intake again increased LDL-C to 222 mg/dL. Her father has mildly elevated LDL-C of 160 mg/dL and her mother had normal LDL-C of 80 mg/dL. Her plasma phytosterol levels were normal and she had ApoE3/E3 genotype. Targeted genetic testing of the patient and parents showed a benign heterozygous LDL receptor (LDLR) variant c.2242G>A; p.Asp748Asn, (Minor allele frequency 0.00008) in the patient and her father. Whole exome sequencing of the patient and both parents showed no known disease-causing variants in LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, LDLRAP1, APOE, STAP1, LIPA, ABCG5, ABCG8 and other known hyperlipidemia-related genes. There are no previous reports of hypercholesterolemia in patients with CFC3. MAP2K1 stimulates various MAP kinases upon wide variety of extra- and intracellular signal and is involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, transcription regulation and development. Previous studies of the relationship between p42/44MAPK activation and LDLR expression in human hepatoma HepG2-derived cell line showed that that activation of the Raf-1/MEK/p42/44MAPK cascade induces LDLR expression and modulation of the Raf-1 kinase signal strength can determine LDLR expression levels. Thus, extent of MAPK activation can alter signaling of LDLR, resulting in hypercholesterolemia. Conclusion: Our case report suggests that MAP2K1 may play a significant role in LDLR signaling, and some MAP2K1 variants may be associated with diet-responsive hypercholesterolemia. Larger studies are required to assess dietary response to LDL-C in subjects with MAP2K1 variants.