Abstract

BackgroundThe impacts of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing (PGT) on health behaviors such as diet and exercise are poorly understood. Our investigation aimed to evaluate diet and exercise changes following PGT and to determine if changes were associated with genetic test results obtained from PGT.MethodsCustomers of 23andMe and Pathway Genomics completed a web-based survey prior to receiving PGT results (baseline) and 6 months post-results. Fruit and vegetable intake (servings/day), and light, vigorous and strength exercise frequency (days/week) were assessed. Changes in diet and exercise were examined using paired t-tests and linear regressions. Additional analyses examined whether outcomes differed by baseline self-reported health (SRH) or content of PGT results.ResultsLongitudinal data were available for 1,002 participants. Significant increases were observed for vegetable intake (mean Δ = 0.11 (95% CI = 0.05, 0.17), p = 0.0003) and strength exercise (Δ = 0.14 (0.03, 0.25), p = 0.0153). When stratified by SRH, significant increases were observed for all outcomes among lower SRH participants: fruit intake, Δ = 0.11 (0.02, 0.21), p = 0.0148; vegetable intake, Δ = 0.16 (0.07, 0.25), p = 0.0005; light exercise, Δ = 0.25 (0.03, 0.47), p = 0.0263; vigorous exercise, Δ = 0.23 (0.06, 0.41), p = 0.0097; strength exercise, Δ = 0.19 (0.01, 0.37), p = 0.0369. A significant change among higher SRH participants was only observed for light exercise, and in the opposite direction: Δ = -0.2468 (-0.06, -0.44), p = 0.0111. Genetic results were not consistently associated with any diet or exercise changes.ConclusionsThe experience of PGT was associated with modest, mostly positive changes in diet and exercise. Associations were independent of genetic results from PGT.

Highlights

  • The impacts of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing (PGT) on health behaviors such as diet and exercise are poorly understood

  • There appears to be a difference in diet and exercise changes when participants are separated by self-reported health status, as the lower SRH group demonstrated a significant increase in fruit consumption and frequency of light and vigorous exercise, while a decrease in the frequency of light exercise was observed among the higher SRH group

  • Nearly a third of participants reported making diet and exercise changes that were directly motivated by their PGT results, there was no consistent evidence that specific genetic risk information received from PGT, or post-PGT change in cardiometabolic disease risk perception, were associated with the specific diet and exercise variables that we measured

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The impacts of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing (PGT) on health behaviors such as diet and exercise are poorly understood. One key question is whether or not PGT has the potential to motivate diet or Nielsen et al BMC Medical Genomics (2017) 10:24 exercise changes that could prevent lifestyle-related chronic diseases, such as heart disease and type 2 diabetes [7] Previous studies examining this question have reported that PGT is not associated with diet or exercise changes [8, 9] or that the PGT experience generally, including the personal context in which testing is sought (but not the individual genetic risk information received), is associated with non-specific, positive health behavior changes [10]. These are important limitations because health behavior has been shown to vary by health status as well as self-perceived health [11], and it is unknown if perceptions of personal disease risk impact diet and exercise following PGT

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call