Abstract

This study investigated diel variations in zooplankton composition and abundance, and the species composition, density, size structure, feeding activity, diet composition and prey selection of larval and 0+ year juvenile fishes in the littoral of a man-made floodplain waterbody over five 24 h periods within a 57 day period. There was a significant difference in the species composition of diurnal and nocturnal catches, with most species consistently peaking in abundance either during daylight or at night, reflecting their main activity period. There were no consistent diel patterns in assemblage structure or the abundance of some species, however, most likely, respectively, due to the phenology of fish hatching and ontogenetic shifts in diel behaviour or habitat use. There were few clear diel patterns in the diet composition or prey selection of larval and 0+ year juvenile roach Rutilus rutilus and perch Perca fluviatilis, with most taxa consistently selected or avoided irrespective of the time of day or night, and no obvious shift between planktonic and benthic food sources, but dietary overlap suggested that interspecific interactions were probably strongest at night. It is essential that sampling programmes account for the diel ecology of the target species, as diurnal surveys alone could produce inaccurate assessments of resource use. The relative lack of consistent diel patterns in this study suggests that multiple 24 h surveys are required in late spring and early summer to provide accurate assessments of 0+ year fish assemblage structure and foraging ecology.

Highlights

  • Temporal variations in organism abundance and population structure are fundamental to the processes driving biological diversity, community ecology and ecosystem functioning

  • Diel variations in fish feeding activity and diet composition can occur, as a consequence of shifts in behaviour, habitat use or prey abundance (Horppila, 1999; Copp et al, 2005; Gliwicz et al, 2006); some species forage only during daylight, for example, whereas others may switch from particulate feeding during daylight to benthic feeding at night (Garner, 1996a)

  • There was a statistically significant difference in the species composition of diurnal and nocturnal catches (PERMANOVA, d.f. = 1, F = 3.805, P = 0.015), and between surveys (PERMANOVA, d.f. = 4, F = 6.709, P < 0.001), but there was no significant interaction between these factors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Temporal variations in organism abundance and population structure are fundamental to the processes driving biological diversity, community ecology and ecosystem functioning. They can have implications for the surveillance, conservation and management of species of particular interest (Cowx et al, 2009; Reynolds et al, 2011; Nunn & Cowx, 2012; Nunn et al, 2014). Gliwicz, 1986; Lauridsen et al, 1996) can have significant implications for the foraging ecology, and potentially the growth, survival and recruitment success, of fishes (see Nunn et al, 2012) This is of particular importance during early development, when fishes are invariably most vulnerable to competition, as well as predation, disease and environmental perturbations (Cryer et al., 1986; Nunn et al, 2007a; Longshaw et al, 2010)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call