Abstract

The distribution of copepod species and their nauplii was studied in a narrow, blind channel on an overwash mangrove island offshore of Belize. Copepodids were sampled with a pump at five stations across the channel during a diel cycle. Diel changes of copepodid stages II – VI were marked by horizontal dispersal of Dioithona oculata, the dominant species, from swarms in the prop roots along the shore during the day to the edge of the prop root habitat at night. Migration of copepodids back to the prop roots appeared to be controlled endogenously because change from a night to a daytime age structure began before first light. Mean copepodid stage at subsurface depths in the channel and prop root edge decreased from 4.2 (with 6.0 = all adults) to 2.9 at predawn to 1.1 during day. The oceanic Oithona nana and O. simplex, and the coastal zone O. fonsecae were evenly distributed with depth and distance from shore during day and night, with avoidance of prop root shoreline during day. These species were much less abundant than Dioithona oculata in the prop roots, but of comparable or greater abundance in the channel. Coastal zone Acartia spinata exhibited evidence of swarming. Nauplii, sampled with a 25μm plankton net, were dominated by harpacticoid (50%) and cyclopoid (34%) nauplii, which generally were more abundant at 1m than at the surface and more abundant at night than the day. Lagrangian current measurements indicated velocities at ebb tide twice those of flood tide (1.9 vs. 0.8 cm s−1) and a minimal residence time of 5 days, which could result in advection of D. oculata nauplii out of the Lair Channel before their recruitment into swarms as copepodid stage II. Previously reported maximum swimming speeds of swarming D. oculata copepodid stages (2.0 cm s−1) and greater densities in prop roots and near the benthos may help copepodids avoid advection. The swarming behavior and diel horizontal migration (or dispersal) reported for D. oculata appears analogous to that of limnetic zooplankton, which may swarm among macrophytes along shorelines during the day to avoid visual predators and disperse or migrate away from the shoreline at night.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call