Abstract
The relationship between “gate” and “road” in Matthew 7:13-14 has always been a crux interpretum. There are basically three options in viewing the relationship. In the case of the first two the point of departure is that the metaphors differ in meaning; each metaphor therefore makes a unique contribution to the text. The two options are: the gate is at the beginning of the road, and the gate is at the end of the road. The third option regards the metaphors as synonyms, thus both conveying the same meaning. This option renders the relationship as of secondary importance.
Highlights
The relationship between “gate” and “road” in Matthew 7:13-14 has always been a crux interpretum
6 Schulz 1972:310-311 huldig presies die teenoorgestelde standpunt, naamlik dat Matteus die oorspronklike bewoording van Q bewaar, en dat die pad-metafoor gevolglik in Q voorgekom het en deur Lukas weggelaat is
Vir die goeie verstaan van die metafore “poort” en “pad” in Matteus 7:13-14 is dit nodig om kortliks op hulle voorkoms en aanwending in die destydse Umwelt te let
Summary
Een van die kernprobleme in die verstaan van Matteus 7:13-14 is die verhouding tussen die metafore “poort” en “pad”. Die artikel wil die kollig laat val op hierdie verhouding. Die aanpak is die volgende: Eers word die wording van die teks ondersoek, waarop die agtergrond van die metafore in die destydse Umwelt bepaal word. Daarna volg ’n oorsig van hoe die metafore moontlik met mekaar verband hou
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.