Abstract

Summary It is generally assumed that the main manuscript of the Theodosian Code, Vat.Reg.Lat. 886, was copied in the 6th century in South-East Gaul, although Italy as provenance is not excluded. This manuscript contains marginal summaries, of which the origin is also attributed to Gaul. However, it can be shown that the largest group was made by one of the scribes (V2*) after 535 and before 554, on the very manuscript, that this was very likely done in Rome, and that the scribe was a Greek, perhaps a Byzantine official. This conclusion bears upon the provenance of Vat.Reg.Lat. 886. The errors in the Greek constitution CTh 9,45,4 imply that it cannot have been copied in the east. It must have been done in the west and not the Code, sent over in 437, was used (or else the Greek would be in order), but a copy of this Code, in which the scribe had misunderstood the Greek and made errors, which then figure in Vat.Reg.Lat. 886. The copying must have been done after 535 and just before the Summaria were made because the author of the Summaria was one of the correctors.

Highlights

  • It is generally assumed that the main manuscript of the Theodosian Code

  • of which the origin is also attributed to Gaul

  • it can be shown that the largest group was made by

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Keywords Vat.Reg.Lat. 886 – Codex Theodosianus – Summaria Antiqua 1 Vat.Reg.Lat. 886 (V) ist eine Handschrift in der Vatikanischen Bibliothek. Sie wurde zuerst von Jean du Tillet erwähnt, der sie für seine Ausgabe des Codex Theodosianus von 1550 benutzte. Paul Petau, der erst bekannte Eigentümer, hat sie möglicherweise von Daniel d’Orléans erworben, der sich 1562 mit der Bibliothek des geplünderten Klosters Fleury beschäftigt hat.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call