Abstract

The two characters used byBurtt (1974) to segregate the genusSchizoboea fromDidymocarpus, viz. “terminal inflorescence” and “fruit splitting into 4 valves”, have been studied in detail: (a) The “terminal inflorescence” represents a bracteate florescence (sensuTroll), that is an open thyrse, peculiar because of its only two extremely condensed internodes (“basic internode” + 1 following internode). Correspondingly, there are only two pairs of bracts from which the lower one only is capable to develop axillary partial florescences, i.e. pair-flowered cymes. Thus, the number of cymes is restricted to 2. Because of the condensed internodes, the inconspicuous bracts, and the densely aggregated flowers the two cymes simulate a unitary, terminal structure. By sympodial (± asymmetrically dichasial) linkage of shoot units, composed of an extended internode, a foliage leaf pair (from the axils of which the consecutive units arise) and the florescence,Schizoboea forms (polytelic) anthocladial shoot systems like some genera of the tribeKlugieae (incl.Loxonieae). (b) The fruit dehisces first loculicidally, then each valve splits into three portions (lateral rib and 2 semivalves). Moreover, the 4 placentae become isolated, thus the old fruit comprises 10 elements forming a loose fascicle.—The segregation ofSchizoboea fromDidymocarpus is supported. Whether the affinity is closer toSaintpaulia (as suspected byBurtt) ot toDidymocarpus, remains undecided: In regard to its shoot and inflorescence organization a morphological derivation is possible from both genera.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call