Abstract
Since they started writing during the Hannibalic war Roman historians used to take a Romecentered view of the world. The paper summerizes the most salient features of the first two centuries of Roman historical writing systematically, treating the causes and prerequisites of its emerging, literary and cultural contexts, and the specific annalistic structure of the later narratives, though Roman historical writing up to and including Livy cannot be subsumed under the umbrella term ‘annalistic’. The development of the genre was in the main determined by individual authors and their works, at its conclusion, in Sallust and Livy it produced authors whose works offered to the Renaissance and the French Revolution archetypes of civic virtue and its decay.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.