Abstract

The planning of housing for informal settlements and squatter camps In South Africa approximately 7 million people live in informal settlements and squatter camps. Constitutional provisions and moral considerations necessitate the urgent involvement of different segments of society to alleviate the plight of this hapless part of the South African population. Since the early nineties the government’s policy regarding squatters has changed from the criminalisation of squatting and the destruction of shelters to the acknowledgement of the right to access to adequate housing and the principle that an unlawful occupier may only be forcibly removed if alternative housing is available. This has led to a massive influx of squatters to squatter camps on the fringes of towns and cities. This article deals with the factors that lead to the establishment of informal settlements and squatter camps, the types of informal settlements and the way in which such settlements and squatter camps can be upgraded to become adequate housing. The consequences of self-help schemes and pirate urbanisation, and especially the advantages and disadvantages of such measures, are critically evaluated. The administration of housing in informal settlements by local authorities, the provision of basic services and the eventual upgrading of informal occupation to ownership are discussed. To facilitate this, the government policy regarding housing planning should be further implemented by removing practical obstacles as soon as possible.

Highlights

  • Informele nedersettings en plakkerskampe is ver verwyderd van die aanvanklike ideale vir behuising in die nuwe Suid-Afrika

  • The shortage of accommodation in urban areas forced them to live in shack towns or squatter camps on open land

  • Die beleid van die vorige regering was tot en met die laat tagtigerjare een van afsonderlike behuisingsbeplanning vir verskillende rassegroepe, wat in die praktyk neergekom het op afsonderlike woongebiede en streng instromingsbeheer. ’n Morele grondslag vir die afsonderlike beplanningsmaatreëls het grootliks ontbreek

Read more

Summary

Agtergrond

Informele nedersettings en plakkerskampe is ver verwyderd van die aanvanklike ideale vir behuising in die nuwe Suid-Afrika. Die volgende hofbeslissing sou inderdaad toegepas kon word op die breë situasie in die land: People squat because they have to, not because they want to The squatters are this country’s people of conscience. Gedurende die vroeg-negentigerjare het simpatieke hofbeslissings egter toenemend bepaal dat uitsettings nie mag plaasvind indien geskikte alternatiewe verblyf nie vir die onwettige okkupeerders gevind kon word nie.. Die behuisingsbeplanning van informele nedersettings en plakkerskampe verskeie ander faktore het ’n groot rol in die toestroming na stedelike gebiede gespeel (Harrison, 1992:14-22). Die doel van hierdie artikel is om regsosiologiese aspekte van plakkerskampe en informele nedersettings wat buite die maatreëls van die Wet op Ontwikkelingsfasilitering 67 van 1995 en die Behuisingswet 107 van 1997 (wat hoofsaaklik oor formele behuisingsontwikkeling handel) bestaan, te ondersoek. Onderlinge begrip is noodsaaklik om die bestaande implementeringsprobleme van behuisingsbeplanning doeltreffend te ondervang

Ontstaan en omvang van informele nedersettings en plakkerskampe
Verstedeliking
Tipes informele behuising
Selfhelpskemas
Opgradering van bestaande informele behuising
Pirate urbanisation: die voorbeeld van Bogota
Administratiewe beheer
Behuising
Vervoer
Voorsiening van dienste aan informele behuisingsgebiede
Opgradering na eiendomsreg of verblyfsekerheid
Gevolgtrekkings en aanbevelings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call