Die Alchemie in der europaischen Kultur- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Christoph Meinel

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessBook ReviewsDie Alchemie in der europaischen Kultur- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Christoph Meinel Bruce T. MoranBruce T. Moran Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 78, Number 3Sep., 1987 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/354530 Views: 2Total views on this site Citations: 23Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1987 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Ettore Asoni Reassessing the camp/prison dichotomy: New directions in geographic research on confinement, Progress in Human Geography 46, no.66 (Sep 2022): 1349–1368.https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221118578Claire Nolasco Braaten, Michael S. Vaughn Litigation on Gender Confirmation Surgery and Hormonal Therapy among Trans Women Prisoners: Views from the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, Women & Criminal Justice 32, no.1-21-2 (Aug 2021): 163–184.https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1962481Sharon Dolovich The Failed Regulation and Oversight of American Prisons, Annual Review of Criminology 5, no.11 (Jan 2022): 153–177.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024445Kathrine Bendtsen On the Force-Feeding of Prisoners on Hunger Strike, HEC Forum 31, no.11 (Oct 2018): 29–48.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-018-9365-4Keramet Reiter, Kelsie Chesnut Correctional Autonomy and Authority in the Rise of Mass Incarceration, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14, no.11 (Oct 2018): 49–68.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031009Vidisha Barua Worley Smart use of smart weapons: jail officer liability for the inappropriate use of tasers and stun guns on pretrial detainees, Security Journal 31, no.33 (Feb 2018): 726–748.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-018-0127-4Roger J. R. Levesque Marital Rights, (Feb 2018): 2224–2227.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33228-4_746Louis A. Ruprecht Secular Courts and Sacred Ties: A Critical Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling on Same-Sex Marriage, Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 99, no.44 (Nov 2016): 429–478.https://doi.org/10.5325/soundings.99.4.0429Rick Dierenfeldt, Greg Lindsteadt, Jacob Laan, Kristen N. Sobba Big Brother as a Contract Monitor: An Assessment of the Use of Contract Staff to Monitor Offender Communications, American Journal of Criminal Justice 41, no.22 (Mar 2015): 279–295.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-015-9295-5Kevin I. Minor, Jennifer L. Tilley The Roberts Court and the Technicalization of Correctional Law, Corrections 1, no.11 (Feb 2016): 20–39.https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2016.1105655Christopher E. Smith Shaping Constitutional Law: The Example of Prisoners’ Rights, (Aug 2016): 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56763-5_1Christopher E. Smith The Expansion and Contraction of Rights: Through the Eyes of Justice Marshall, (Aug 2016): 37–59.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56763-5_3Christopher E. Smith A Protective Constitutional Vision: Justice Stevens and the Principles of Liberty, (Aug 2016): 61–83.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56763-5_4Christopher E. Smith A Rejectionist Constitutional Vision: Justice Thomas and Originalist Arguments, (Aug 2016): 85–107.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56763-5_5Christopher E. Smith The Pragmatic Middle and Its Consequences: The Influence of Justice O’Connor, (Aug 2016): 109–128.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56763-5_6Christopher E. Smith Redefinition of Precedent: The Influence of Justice Scalia, (Aug 2016): 153–173.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56763-5_8Christopher E. Smith Reaction and Retrenchment, (Aug 2016): 175–195.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56763-5_9James E. Robertson Recent Legal Developments, Criminal Justice Review 38, no.22 (Mar 2013): 256–270.https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016813479081Naoki Kanaboshi, James F. Anderson Conjugal visits could test the limits of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, Criminal Justice Studies 24, no.44 (Nov 2011): 381–393.https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2011.625700Mie Lewis The Human Rights of Children in Conflict with the Law: Lessons for the U.S. Human Rights Movement, (Apr 2011): 255–273.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511842269.014Lee Boothby Protecting Freedom of Religion or Belief in Restricted or Institutional Settings, (Jan 2004): 407–423.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5616-7_16Frederick R. Parker, Charles J. Paine Informed Consent and the Refusal of Medical Treatment in the Correctional Setting, The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 27, no.33 (Jun 2016): 240–251.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.1999.tb01458.xJ. Richard Ciccone THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AND PSYCHIATRY IN THE 1990s, Psychiatric Clinics of North America 22, no.11 (Mar 1999): 197–211.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-953X(05)70069-1