Abstract
In the much maligned and neglected philosophy of eighteenth-century France, Diderot stands out as the leading, most creative, and revolutionary force. This essay, reworked from a longer unpublished work, attempts to indicate some of the roots of Diderot’s materialism and also the developments which his own thinking produced. Acknowledging his debt to Descartes and to the mechanist tradition in France and England, we are here most concerned with Diderot’s struggle to break through the limits of this reductionist mechanism, to cope with the contradiction in the materialism of the mechanists, which gave rise to the idealist critique of mechanism and to the idealist solutions of vitalism and hylozoism. Therefore we deal here with Diderot’s relation to Spinoza and Leibniz, and to Robinet, Maupertuis, and La Mettrie. The logic of change, motion, transformation, which had been developed in the main by the idealist philosophers and whose absence was the Achilles’ Heel of mechanism, is grasped by Diderot not in its idealist form, but rather, as the logic of a material universe, which itself changes, moves, is in constant transformation. In a sense, Diderot puts the idealistic logic of change back on its feet, starting from the outermost limits of mechanism.KeywordsPrime MoverMaterial WorldQualitative LevelMaterial UniverseCartesian DualismThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.