Did the Scientific Innovations in the Management of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Improve the Outcome during the Last 2 Decades?

Abstract

Objectives: Previous reviews reported the outcome of each scientific modality in the management of T1 high-grade bladder cancer. The objective of this review is to assess and evaluate the available scientific modalities used during the last two decades and determine whether they were able to improve the clinical outcome. Literature Search Methodology: A systematic literature review was conducted from 2000-2020 using PubMed, Medline, Embase, and other database sites looking at randomized controlled trials (RCTs), clinical trials, research, review articles, and original articles addressing the different scientific modalities used to diagnose and manage patients with non-muscle invasive Bladder cancer (NMIBC)during the last 2 decades. More than 573 studies were retrieved following the preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and PICOS criteria (Population, Intervention, Comparators, Outcomes, and Study design). Only 85 articles were selected for review including 19 prospective trials, 44 RCTs, original articles, research articles, one review article, and clinical trials—Retrospective studies were excluded to limit bias as much as possible in the analysis. Results: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have become the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy of new treatments. They are considered the highest standard of evidence-based medicine and are the method of choice. Overall, we selected 85 studies for review, among them 63 prospective trials and RCTs, with a total of 21,895 patients, published between 2000 and 2020. Previously conducted studies have shown that identifying rare histological types with poor prognoses can help improve outcomes, mainly the plasmacytoid type. Many articles addressed the role of biomarkers in the early identification of patients with NMIBC for recurrence and progression—P-cadherin expression and others were used to predict recurrence and/or progression with promising results. Despite the need for modifications, risk stratification is an important tool that should be used to improve the outcome of patients with NMIBC. Some found that fluorescence diagnostic cystoscopy (FDC) and Photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) improved recurrence-free survival but not progression and outcome. All authors agree that intravesical BCG is the most effective therapy that changes the course of high-grade T1 mainly progression. Re-TURBT has become one of the recommendations of international societies, but its potential effect on survival improvement is debatable. Most of the articles showed the advantages of early cystectomy in NMIBC but all agree that the selection criteria must be clearly defined. Conclusions: This review analyzed the outcomes provided by the scientific advances in the field of management of NMIBC patients in the last two decades. Patients with T1 bladder cancer have variable outcomes because of tumor heterogeneity and clinical staging. Despite the great development in the field of diagnosis, risk stratification, and management, further large studies are mostly needed to better elucidate this subset of patients and avoid over and under-treatment.